CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

No public grade applies yet

Reforestation of degraded grasslands in Uchindile & Mapanda, Tanzania

Standard
VCS
Methodology
AR-AM0005 (CDM)
Registry
VCS-142 ↗ · Verification overdue
Country
Tanzania
Credit type
Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use
Developer
Green Resources Tanzania Ltd (GRL)
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Reforestation of degraded grasslands in Uchindile & Mapanda, Tanzania (VCS-142) no number (No public grade applies yet): CarbonMeld read its documents, but its type of project does not yet have a public grade that applies to it on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Assessment

Document-based rating

No public grade applies yet

No public source has yet given this type of project grades on both additionality and quantification that apply here. CarbonMeld read this project's documents. The analysis is below. The page can receive a number once a public grade of its type of project applies on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Evidence coverage: medium

Methodology v3 · documents read on 21 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme)
  • Quantification: no public grade of this type of project applies
  • Permanence: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI grades permanence by programme: this is its grade of the project's programme)
  • Claim safety: no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that lower a dimension or the rating as a whole: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted by the method

  • Quantification: no public grade of this type of project applies
  • Quantification: CCQI does not grade this methodology under this programme, so no public grade applies
  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · About the System

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
AR-AM0005 (per the registry) How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 21 Oct 2026

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2002
139,358139,3580
2008
22,79022,7900
2012
59,73859,7380
2013
532,089493,35638,733
Total753,975715,24238,733

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2002–2008AR-AM0005 v3.0since replaced by v4.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2008–2012AR-AM0005 v3.0since replaced by v4.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2012–2013AR-AM0005 v3.0since replaced by v4.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2013–2020AR-AM0005 v4.0last published version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. Period not statedAR-AM0005 v3.0since replaced by v4.0

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • AR-AM0005: Withdrawn (CDM / UNFCCC) · replaced by AR-ACM0003 · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+33)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Report an error on this page

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Report an error on this page

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Report an error on this page →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Reforestation of degraded grasslands in Uchindile & Mapanda, Tanzania (VCS-142): CarbonMeld document-based analysis, methodology v3, documents read on 21 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/reforestation-of-degraded-grasslands-in-uchindile-mapanda-tanzania/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and the day the documents were read; the page gives no number.

Unlock the full analysis

Every rule that applies to the project, each with its fact, its quote, its source and, where it has them, its points; the detail and quotes of the negative facts; and 24 registry documents (17 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.