Vai al contenuto principale
VCS Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use Rwanda Registry: Registered Documentazione completa General Methodology v2.0

Rwanda Riparian Restoration Project

VCS-3072 ↗

6.8 / 10
Integrity
6.8
Transparency
7.2
Claim Safety
6.1
Documentation
7.0

Detailed Analysis

Integrity

['✓ TÜV NORD validation [Validation Report 15.12.2022/15.09.2023] supports ARR/revegetation on degraded riparian land, non-forest for 10+ years', '~ Leakage is treated as not required because agricultural displacement is not expected; no quantified deduction is shown [Validation Report]']

Transparency

['✓ Public validation report and project description are available via the official registry extract', '✗ No monitoring report or issuance/retirement record provided in the evidence set']

Claim Safety

['✓ Recent project start date (01/10/2022) and registration (2023-12-27) reduce vintage-age claim risk', '✗ No evidence of CCP eligibility, Article 6 authorization, corresponding adjustment, or public retirement trail']

Documentation

['✓ Validation report is public and detailed, with site visit, interviews, and methodology references', '✗ Monitoring report and third-party verification of issued credits are not included in the provided documents']

Overall

Overall, this project scores as a moderately strong AFOLU restoration project with credible third-party validation and a reasonably conservative narrative around degraded riparian land, ownership, and non-forest eligibility. The main limitation is evidence scope: this is not registry-grade because the monitoring report and issuance/retirement trail are absent from the provided materials. Confidence is medium because the validation report is substantive, but the score is constrained by the lack of post-implementation MRV and public credit lifecycle evidence. The biggest positive driver is the independent validation of land eligibility and project design; the biggest drag is incomplete transparency around realized outcomes and claimability.

Audit Analysis

This is a partial-evidence VCS AFOLU project with a public validation report and project description, but no monitoring report or issuance/retirement record provided here. The audited documentation supports a credible ARR-style revegetation project, though claim safety is limited by the absence of post-registration monitoring and any public evidence of issued credits.

Project Description

Proponent: EcoPlanet Bamboo Group, LLC Protocol categories: Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use Protocols: AR-ACM0003 Estimated annual GHG reductions: 51964 tCO2e Region: Africa Registration date: 2023-12-27

Red Flags

  • No public monitoring report provided, so realized removals and operational performance cannot be independently checked
  • No public issuance/retirement record shown, limiting buyer claim traceability
  • Leakage is asserted as not required rather than quantified

Credit Vintages

Nessuna emissione registrata sul registro.

Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio

  • Publish the first monitoring report with survival rates, clump counts, and measured removals on the registry
  • Add a public issuance and retirement trail for each vintage, including serial numbers and retirement purpose
  • Disclose the non-permanence risk buffer percentage and any leakage assessment details in a public monitoring annex

Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

validated pre-issuance, but still based on project design an

Permanence

AFOLU reversal risk exists; validation references non-perman

Leakage

no quantified leakage deduction; justification relies on no

Baseline

baseline and land eligibility were independently validated o

Safeguards

stakeholder consultation, land rights, and no-net-harm claim

Double-claim

VCS registration is clear, but retirement/corresponding-adju

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis Provenance Scored 2026-04-08 General Methodology v2.0 Documentazione completa

Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?

Correzione metadati (gratuita)

Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.

Non modifica lo score.

[email protected]

Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti

Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.

Invia Documenti