Safe Water Systems for Rural Uganda
Score Breakdown
Integrity
verified The monitoring report shows a combined additionality test and a quantified leakage deduction of 5%, with no material findings reported.
missing The extracted record does not state that additionality was verified by the VVB, and the baseline is project-specific with no reassessment date found.
Transparency
verified The monitoring period is clearly stated, and the report includes annual survey-based usage monitoring plus a verified usage rate of 94%.
missing The extracted record does not identify the VVB, and claimed versus verified ERR totals are not available in the extracted documents.
Claim Safety
verified The project is Gold Standard certified, uses a quantified leakage deduction, and reports a verified usage rate above the national default FNRB value of 90.
missing The baseline is project-specific rather than jurisdictional, and CORSIA eligibility / CCP status are not stated in the extracted record.
Documentation
verified The record draws on six documents, including a monitoring report and stakeholder consultation material, and extraction confidence is high.
missing The VVB name is missing, and several important fields such as buffer pool treatment, reversal history, and baseline reassessment timing are not stated.
Detailed Analysis
Integrity
The monitoring report dated 2023-10-23 shows a combined additionality test, a project-specific baseline, and a leakage deduction of 5%, which supports a moderate-to-strong integrity assessment. No material findings or corrective actions were reported, but the extracted record does not show VVB confirmation of additionality, buffer pool treatment, or any reversal history, so permanence and audit robustness are only partially evidenced.
Transparency
Transparency is fair but not strong because the monitoring period is clearly stated and usage monitoring is described as an annual survey with a verified usage rate of 94%. However, the extracted record does not identify the VVB, and the totals for claimed versus verified emission reductions are not available, limiting public traceability and completeness.
Claim Safety
Claim safety is supported by Gold Standard certification, a quantified leakage deduction, and a verified usage rate that exceeds the national default FNRB value of 90. That said, the baseline remains project-specific rather than standardized or jurisdictional, and the extracted record does not state CORSIA eligibility or CCP status, so residual over-claiming risk remains.
Documentation
Documentation quality is acceptable because six documents were used, including a monitoring report and stakeholder consultation material, and extraction confidence is high. Even so, the record lacks the VVB name and does not state key items such as buffer pool percentage, reversal events, or baseline reassessment timing, which keeps the documentation score from being higher.
Overall
The project looks reasonably solid on the available evidence, but it is not fully transparent or fully auditable from the extracted record alone. There are no contradictions listed in the merged facts, so no document hierarchy decision was needed; the main limitation is missing information rather than conflicting information. The overall score is held back by incomplete verification detail and the absence of explicit permanence and registry-claim safeguards.
Audit Analysis
This is a Gold Standard certified safe water project with a documented combined additionality test, a quantified leakage deduction, and no material findings in the monitoring report. The main weaknesses are that key verification details are missing from the extracted record, and the project relies on a project-specific baseline with no visible reassessment date, which limits confidence in long-term robustness.
Project Description
Over 21 million people in Uganda are living without basic access to clean drinking water. The vast majority of people rely on water boiling to purify their water and prevent water borne diseases like diarrhoea, typhoid, and cholera. TASC has financed the distribution of 30,000 Purifaaya ceramic water filters produced by SPOUTS of Water in Uganda to households in the western parts of the country. SPOUTS have been manufacturing and distributing ceramic water filters since 2012 which sit in a 20 litre plastic container that is able to provide for households of up to 8 people. It ensures up to 5 years of safe drinking water with the ability to simply replace the filters. Water filters take away the need to boil water and, therefore, reduce the reliance on wood and/or charcoal in the purification process. Purifaaya water filters have been used in 5 registered Gold Standard projects since 2017. SPOUTS has a 1-star water filter rating from the World Health Organisation for preventing bacterial water borne diseases, and further certification from the relevant water authorities in Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda. Furthermore, the Purifaaya filters have undergone and passed testing in Uganda for bottled water grade water purity. Project Impacts and Benefits In the first monitoring period: Good health and wellbeing - 99.1% of project households reported an improvement in their health after the introduction of a Safe Water System (SWS). Gender equality - project households reported a time savings at least 2.46 hours/week after the introduction of the SWS; female beneficiaries may use time saved collecting fuel or purifying water to pursue other education or economic activities. No Poverty - More than 30,000 households received a SWS. Decent work - 61 individuals were employed during the distribution, monitoring, and evaluation of the project. More details on this project are available in the Gold Standard Impact Registry N.B. Individual vi
Red Flags
- The extracted record does not show VVB identity or explicit VVB confirmation of additionality, which weakens audit traceability.
- Baseline reassessment timing, buffer pool treatment, and any reversal history are not stated in the available documents.
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 18,677 | 18,677 | 0 | |
| 2023 | 34,817 | 10,839 | 23,978 | |
| 2024 | 12,617 | 0 | 12,617 | |
| Total | 66,111 | 29,516 | 36,595 |
Cosa migliorerebbe questo punteggio
- Provide the VVB name and the verification statement showing explicit confirmation of additionality and monitoring results.
- Disclose buffer pool treatment, any reversal history, and the baseline reassessment schedule, along with claimed versus verified emission reduction totals.
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
Test present, VVB confirmation not shown
No buffer or reversal evidence stated
Quantified 5% deduction
Project baseline, reassessment timing missing
FPIC, grievance, and benefit sharing documented
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Where to buy
Marketplaces
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
⚑ Dispute this rating
Sei il proprietario di questo progetto?
Correzione metadati (gratuita)
Nome, paese, marketplace o link errati? Segnalacelo.
Non modifica lo score.
[email protected] →Rivalutazione con nuovi documenti
Hai documentazione aggiornata non ancora inclusa? Puoi richiedere un nuovo run della pipeline con i nuovi input.
Invia Documenti →