Sah Wind Power Plant

Integrity

The verification report supports a reasonably strong integrity case because additionality was confirmed by the VVB using an investment test, and the project applies ACM0002 with a project baseline. Leakage is treated with a quantified deduction of 0%, but the record does not state a buffer pool percentage and marks reversal events as not addressed, which weakens permanence confidence.

Transparency

Transparency is mixed: the verification report states the monitoring period, registry, methodology version, and that claimed and verified ERs are both 290,808. However, key MRV details such as the usage monitoring method and verified usage rate are not found in the extracted record, and the low extraction confidence suggests at least one source was difficult to read.

Claim Safety

Claim safety is moderate but not strong. The project is a wind project under ACM0002 with a project baseline and a quantified leakage deduction, which is generally supportive, but the record contains contradictions on leakage justification and credited volumes, including earlier figures of 488,920 claimed and 529,365 verified ERs versus the current 290,808 figure.

Documentation

Documentation quality is limited by low extraction confidence and several unresolved findings in the verification report, including CARs and FARs that were not fully closed in the extracted record. The project does have a recent verification report and a large document set, but the contradictory crediting-period information and open items reduce confidence in completeness.

Overall

Overall, this is a mid-quality wind project with some strong elements, especially VVB-confirmed additionality and a recent verification report, but the evidence base is weakened by low extraction confidence and several contradictions. I privileged the most recent verification report dated 2026-02-20 for the current values on additionality, leakage, and issuance volumes, because it is newer and more specific than earlier documents; however, the earlier documents still matter because they show that the record has changed over time. The contradictions on additionality type, leakage justification, total ERs, reversal status, and crediting period indicate reliability risk, so the scores are adjusted downward.