Vaspet-II and Vaspet-III Wind Power Project, Maharashtra
#1049of 1935 in Renewable energy#533of 975 in India#686of 1339 in Verra (VCS)#829of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A 10-year VCS wind power project in Maharashtra with a solid investment-test additionality assessment and low inherent permanence risk, but undermined by a missing leakage justification in the latest verification report, a baseline-method contradiction between documents, an unresolved proof-of-rights issue, and a cluster of open corrective actions that signal documentation and governance gaps.
Red Flags
- Registration was signed by Value Network Venture Advisory Services LLP without a proof-of-right document demonstrating sole assignment of GHG emission reductions for the full crediting period
- Leakage deduction of 0% is reported in the 2024 verification report with no supporting justification, whereas the 2022 verification report had described the leakage as quantified
- Baseline method is described as 'project' in the 2024 verification report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2025 monitoring report, creating ambiguity about the actual baseline approach
- Eleven corrective actions remain open, including gaps in SDG assessment, meter-calibration impact on ERR, and inconsistent information across the PDMR and JVVR
- Minimum extraction confidence across the 44 source documents is rated low, reducing reliability of the structured data
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 46,851 | 46,851 | 0 | |
| 2014 | 82,588 | 79,647 | 2,941 | |
| 2015 | 92,363 | 92,363 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 96,931 | 57,035 | 39,896 | |
| 2017 | 84,879 | 33,358 | 51,521 | |
| 2018 | 88,140 | 37,903 | 50,237 | |
| 2019 | 149,377 | 149,377 | 0 | |
| 2020 | 83,993 | 83,993 | 0 | |
| 2021 | 79,313 | 57,565 | 21,748 | |
| 2022 | 79,328 | 73,005 | 6,323 | |
| 2023 | 10,999 | 3,146 | 7,853 | |
| Total | 894,762 | 714,243 | 180,519 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Wind power – no inherent reversal risk
0% deduction, justification missing in latest VR
Grid EF used but method description inconsistent across docs
FPIC and grievance mechanism present but documentation gaps
CORSIA-eligible; CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →