Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

PURO-TSB — Terrestrial Storage of Biomass

About this methodology

Biomass that absorbed carbon dioxide as it grew is placed in a purpose-built terrestrial storage environment that keeps it from decomposing.

Version
2023.1 · source ·
Climate outcome
CO2 removals
Activity
Biomass storage
Official page
puro.earth ·

How our current method reads projects of this type

Versions of the official text these rules cover: Edition 2023 v.1

What CarbonMeld reads

  • Integrity shown

    Additionality: the project must show it with a test. CarbonMeld reads the test in the documents.CM-F-PURO-TSB-ADDITIONALITY

    Link
  • shown

    Durability of the storage: the methodology sets rules for it (TSB 2023, p. 4). CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-PURO-TSB-DURABILITY-MEASUREMENT

    Link
  • shown

    Sustainability of the feedstock: the methodology sets rules for it. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents.CM-F-PURO-TSB-FEEDSTOCK-SUSTAINABILITY

    Link

Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method

  • not assessed

    Leakage: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases (TSB 2023 leakage, p. 24). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-PURO-TSB-LEAKAGE

    Link
  • not assessed

    Permanence and reversals: the methodology sets rules for it (TSB 2023 definitions, p. 3). Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-PURO-TSB-PERMANENCE-REVERSAL

    Link
  • not assessed

    No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it. Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-PURO-TSB-REGULATORY-SURPLUS

    Link
  • not assessed

    Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): any such rules come from the programme, not the methodology. Our current method does not assess it.CM-F-PURO-TSB-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC

    Link

Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method

The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.

  • Grid emission factorCM-N-GRID-EF
  • Fraction of non-renewable biomass (fNRB)CM-N-FNRB
  • Usage rate of the devicesCM-N-USAGE
  • Tracking of the end useCM-N-END-USE-TRACKING

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

Top projects using PURO-TSB

This page ranks projects using PURO-TSB by their CarbonMeld document-based assessment scores. The rank compares project assessments; it is not a rating of the methodology itself.

7 rated projects of the 8 tracked in this methodology · average score 5.5/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

7 analysed project pages, A–Z →

#1 Mast Wood Preserve MT1 PUR United States Biomass Registry: status unavailable 7.3/10 ▲ +2.6 #2 InterEarth Bowgada PUR Australia Biomass Registry: status unavailable 5.9/10 #3 Dragonfly PUR Namibia Biomass Registry: status unavailable 5.7/10 ▼ -0.1
  1. 4
    Carbonsate Project Namibia PUR Namibia Biomass Registry: status unavailable
    5.4 ▼ -0.4
  2. 5
    Fasera TSB Facility 1 PUR Australia Biomass Registry: status unavailable
    5.1 ▼ -0.9
  3. 6
    CSI-Hardin PUR United States Biomass Registry: status unavailable
    4.7 ▲ +0.4
  4. 7
    La Veta PUR United States Biomass Registry: status unavailable
    4.2 ▲ +0.5

← All leaderboards · Full database