UCRKarnataka IndiaAMS-I.D

28.7MW Biomass based Power Generation by M/s CBKSSKN, Chikkodi by Energy Advisory Services

UCR-322 ↗

#123of 196 in Biomass#5of 17 in Karnataka India#102of 421 in Universal Carbon Registry (UCR)#233of 417 in AMS-I.D

3.7/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
2.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
2.5

Scored2026-08-19low confidence Latest verified monitoring: 2021-12-31

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

This 28.7 MW bagasse-based cogeneration project in Karnataka uses a jurisdictional baseline and reports no material findings or corrective actions, which are positive signals. However, the extracted record contains only a single PDD document with no verification or monitoring reports, no identified VVB, and no verified emission reduction figures, leaving substantial evidence gaps across additionality, permanence, and MRV. The 0% leakage deduction is reasonable for a biomass power project but is supported only by a brief 'deemed negligible' note.

Red Flags

  • No verification report or monitoring report is present in the extracted record; only a PDD (dated 2023-04-25) was used, leaving additionality, MRV, and verified ERR figures entirely unconfirmed
  • No VVB is identified and no additionality test type is stated in the available data, making it impossible to confirm that additionality was independently verified
  • No verified emission reduction figures are available to cross-check against the 486,000 tCO2e claimed over the 2013–2021 crediting period
  • CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are both unstated, leaving dual-channel or double-claiming risk unassessed

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test type not stated; no VVB confirmation found

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal data; risk unaddressed

Leakage

0% deemed negligible; justification thin but plausible for b

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline used; reassessment timing not stated

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not detai

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both unstated; risk unassessed

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-19AMS I.D.
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →