Skip to main content
CDMHydroIndiaAMS-I.D

4.5MW grid-connected Sugur Mini Hydel Scheme at SLS Power Industries Ltd in Bellary District, Karnataka

CDM-0921 ↗

#90of 387 in India#28of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#46of 417 in AMS-I.D

5.9/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
5.0

Audit Analysis

A straightforward 4.5 MW grid-connected mini-hydro displacement project in Karnataka, India, validated under CDM AMS-I.D. v18.0 with a jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. The project is low-risk in design (hydro displacing grid electricity, minimal leakage, no reversal risk), but the documentation record is thin — no monitoring report, no verification report, and a significant (7×) discrepancy between the PDD's initial CER estimate and the validated figure, explained by a revised grid emission factor. Overall a credible but modestly documented project with no major integrity concerns.

Red Flags

  • The PDD (Feb 2022) estimated 68,481 CERs over the crediting period, but the validation report (Mar 2022) revised this to 9,783 — a ~7× reduction attributed to a change in the baseline grid emission factor (CAR #1). While the correction was caught during validation, the initial PDD figure was substantially overstated.
  • No monitoring report or verification report appears in the extracted record; the monitoring period is not stated, making it impossible to confirm that any credits have actually been issued or verified post-validation.
  • Leakage treatment is inconsistent across documents: the validation report (Mar 2022) states leakage is 'deemed negligible' (0% deduction), while an earlier appendix (Oct 2021) describes it as 'quantified.' The final position is 0% with a negligible justification, but the inconsistency weakens confidence in the leakage analysis.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2008
6,20306,203
2009
4,53204,532
2011
4,92004,920
2012
6,01806,018
2013
8,59308,593
2022
31,350031,350
Total61,616061,616

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test applied per AMS-I.D.

Permanence

No buffer pool; low inherent risk but no explicit safeguard

Leakage

0% deduction, negligible justification; minor doc inconsiste

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid-EF baseline, reassessed 2022

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not docum

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25AMS-I.D.

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents