Skip to main content
ACRForest CarbonWISCONSIN, USGeneral Methodologyv2.0

Anew � Badger Woodlands Forestry Project

ACR-1070 ↗

#65of 69 in REDD+#109of 115 in United States#44of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)

1.4/ 10
Integrity
0.5
Transparency
1.0
Claim Safety
2.5
Documentation
2.0

Audit Analysis

The project exhibits severe evidence gaps across all critical quality dimensions, with nearly all key verification and monitoring data missing from the available records. While no material findings or contradictions were reported, the absence of baseline, additionality, leakage, and permanence documentation prevents any meaningful assessment of credit integrity or claim safety. Substantially more complete verification and monitoring reports are required to establish credibility.

Red Flags

  • Complete absence of VVB confirmation, baseline methodology, and buffer pool information
  • No monitoring period, verified emission reductions, or leakage deductions documented
  • CORSIA and CCP eligibility status entirely unreported
  • Leakage not addressed in project documentation
  • Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Not assessed

Permanence

Unverified

Leakage

Not addressed

Baseline

Not stated

Safeguards

Not documented

Double-claim

Status unknown

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-06General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents