Anew - Gotham Woods Forestry Project
#56of 69 in REDD+#95of 115 in United States#32of 45 in American Carbon Registry (ACR)
Audit Analysis
The project record is severely data-poor, relying on a single unidentified document with no verification reports or monitoring data. Core safeguards including additionality assessment, baseline methodology, and leakage treatment are entirely missing from the extracted record. Substantial documentation gaps prevent any reliable quality assessment at this stage.
Red Flags
- No additionality assessment or independent verification found in available documents
- Baseline methodology and leakage treatment entirely missing despite forestry classification
- CORSIA and CCP eligibility status not stated, leaving double-claiming risk unaddressed
- Leakage not addressed in project documentation
- Buffer pool size not disclosed in available documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
No assessment found
Buffer pool and reversal risk unaddressed
Leakage not addressed in available records
Baseline method not stated
Safeguards documentation absent
CORSIA and CCP status not stated
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
