CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
Re-assessment pendingVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalThailandRegistry: Registered

Chol Charoen Group Wastewater Treatment with Biogas System I (Chacherngsao)

Developer: S.C. Industry Co., Ltd

VCS-428 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#44of 523 in Biogas#32of 138 in Thailand#421of 1609 in Verra (VCS)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 2 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.8 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-02medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends: 2022-07-31

evidence:41/41registry documents analyzed · 4red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

A long-running Thai biogas project (operating since 2009) with a VVB-verified investment additionality test and no reversal events, but undermined by an unaddressed leakage assessment in the most recent verification, multiple instrument calibration gaps, and a significant discrepancy between claimed and verified emission reductions within the same monitoring report. The project's safeguards and grievance mechanisms are well documented, and CORSIA ineligibility eliminates dual-channel risk, but the absence of a stated buffer pool and usage monitoring details leaves meaningful gaps in the MRV chain.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 41 registry documents (41 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-11

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
5,2295,2290
2010
15,61215,6120
2011
21,06621,0660
2012
21,00021,0000
2013
16,89016,8900
2014
10,51610,5160
2015
31,69331,6930
2016
45,73645,7360
2017
37,12037,1200
2018
45,83545,8350
2019
56,96856,9680
2020
29,67829,6780
2021
22,44016,2986,142
2022
3,1592582,901
Total362,942353,8999,043

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2009–2013AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2013–2014AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2014–2016AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2017–2018AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2019AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2019AMS-III.H v19.0current version

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2020AMS-I.C v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

  8. 2020AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

  9. 2020AMS-III.H v19.0current version

    monitoring report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  10. 2020–2021AMS-I.C v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  11. 2020–2021AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  12. 2020–2021AMS-III.H v19.0current version

    monitoring report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  13. 2021–2022AMS-I.C v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  14. 2021–2022AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  15. 2021–2022AMS-III.H v19.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.C: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-I.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.H: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →