Dilek Wind Power Plant
GS-554 ↗ · current registry ID: GS3334
#174of 770 in Renewable energy#38of 121 in Turkey#83of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)#132of 383 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
The Dilek Wind Power Plant is a VVB-verified wind project with a confirmed investment additionality test and no inherent reversal risk, but it is undermined by six cross-document contradictions (baseline method, grid emission factor, ERR figures, crediting period, leakage justification, and reversal treatment) and a low extraction confidence rating. The project over-delivered relative to its pro-rata expectation, reducing over-crediting risk, yet the absence of stated CORSIA/CCP status, FPIC documentation, and a buffer pool leaves material gaps in the evidence base.
Red Flags
- Six contradictions across documents, including a 60% discrepancy in total ERR claimed (264,284 vs 422,099) and conflicting baseline method (project-specific vs jurisdictional), undermining data reliability
- Minimum extraction confidence rated 'low', indicating at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing confidence in all extracted figures
- CORSIA eligibility and CCP status are not stated in any available document, leaving double-claiming risk unassessed
- FPIC (Free, Prior and Informed Consent) is not documented in the extracted record despite the project's community-facing nature
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 28,853 | 0 | 28,853 | |
| 2021 | 29,655 | 0 | 29,655 | |
| 2022 | 1,705 | 0 | 1,705 | |
| Total | 60,213 | 0 | 60,213 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed investment test
Wind avoidance – no inherent reversal risk
0% deduction, quantified justification, appropriate for wind
Project-specific baseline; method contradicted across docume
Grievance mechanism present; FPIC not documented
CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →