Skip to main content
ScoredGSSmall, Low - Impact HydroViet NamRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Dak Pone Hydropower Project

Developer: Vietnam Carbon Assets Ltd

GS-206 ↗ · current registry ID: GS1347

#417of 4029 in Renewable energy#17of 157 in Vietnam#48of 1869 in Gold Standard (GS)#267of 2741 in ACM0002

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.5 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Analysis

The Dak Pone Hydropower Project is a long-running small-scale renewable energy project in Vietnam with a confirmed investment-test additionality, a jurisdictional baseline reassessed in 2024, and no reversal events. However, the project has accumulated a substantial history of corrective actions across multiple verification cycles, the 1.6 MW expansion unit remains uncommissioned, and several data contradictions (grid emission factor, baseline method, FPIC status) reduce confidence in the extracted record. Overall, the project is credible but carries moderate documentation and data-consistency risks.

Red Flags

3 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 3 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 57 registry documents (55 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
13,355013,355
2013
28,511028,511
2014
30,419030,419
2015
28,616028,616
2016
26,826026,826
2017
40,808040,808
2018
45,160045,160
2019
44,829044,829
2020
44,150044,150
2021
57,07657,0760
2022
69,42869,4280
2023
52,37319,91232,461
2024
36,939036,939
2025
5,40405,404
Total523,894146,416377,478

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →