CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Ecomapua Amazon REDD Project

Standard
VCS
Methodology
VM0015 (VCS)
Registry
VCS-1094 ↗ · Suspended
Country
Brazil
Credit type
Forestry
Developer
Ecomapuá Conservação Ltda
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Ecomapua Amazon REDD Project (VCS-1094) 0.0 out of 10 (Very low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 16 Oct 2026. The analysis read 28 of the 33 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Registry status: suspended

The registry has put the project on hold, usually pending a review or a notice to the developer. No credits are issued while the hold lasts.

Only the vintages issued before the change (below) exist on the registry. Verify any resale claim against those vintages.

Verra: “On Hold - see notification letter”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

01020304 Document-based rating 0.0 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Permanence 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

0.0/10

Very low rating (under 3.5)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 16 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Permanence: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI grades permanence by programme: this is its grade of the project's programme)
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that lowered the number: 3

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Negative facts

  • Registry status: On Hold

Credits issued under this methodology cannot receive the CCP label (ICVCM, 15 Nov 2024).

Not counted in the number

  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 16 Oct 2026Latest verified period ends:

evidence: 28/33 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
VM0015 v1.1 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 16 Oct 2026 · 28/33 registry documents read

Analysis

Ecomapua Amazon REDD Project (Brazil) avoids deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) (Avoided Deforestation without Logging on riparian dense tropical rainforest) under VM0015 v1.1; registry status Suspended (VCS), 2,071,291 credits issued (vintages 2003–2017). The documents name TÜV Rheinland do Brasil Ltda. (On behalf of TÜV Rheinland (China) Ltd.) as validation body and RINA Services S.p.A. (RINA) (2003-01-01 – 2012-12-31), Carbon Check (India) Private Ltd (2013-01-01 – 2017-12-31) as verification bodies. Project area: 97,007 ha. The verification report for the period (01-January-2003 – 31-December-2012) verifies 1,448,333 tCO2e. The monitoring report for the same period reports 2,069,055 tCO2e. The registry opened a review of the project (its review notification letter of 2025-12-08); further credit issuance is suspended while the review is ongoing.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No CCP label under this methodology

    Credits issued under this methodology cannot receive the CCP label (ICVCM, 15 Nov 2024).

    Source: ICVCM assessment · read date not recorded

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2003
442,256440,0572,199
2004
90,53990,5390
2005
97,72597,7250
2006
154,964127,15027,814
2007
198,289192,8175,472
2008
11,86611,8660
2009
151,88867,68284,206
2010
156,230147,8348,396
2011
259,271259,23041
2012
333,324273,07060,254
2013
17,97515,8182,157
2014
41,86737,1194,748
2015
61,06115,42245,639
2016
31,01727,2953,722
2017
23,01916,3956,624
Total2,071,2911,820,019251,272

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2003–2012VM0015 v1.1since replaced by v1.2

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2013–2017VM0015 v1.1since replaced by v1.2

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. Period not statedVM0015 v1.1since replaced by v1.2

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • VM0015: Active (Verra / Verified Carbon Standard) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+101)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Each listing shows what the shop published on the day it was checked. The registry balance on this page is not a seller's stock, and some shops show no price.

Carbonmarksold out

checked on 12 Nov 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Ecomapua Amazon REDD Project (VCS-1094): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 16 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/ecomapua-amazon-redd-project/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 33 registry documents (28 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.