CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Improved cook-stoves in Guinea

Standard
GS
Methodology
GS-SIMPLIFIED-COOKSTOVES (GS)
Registry
GS-1244 ↗ · current registry ID: GS880 · Registered
Country
Guinea
Credit type
Energy Efficiency - Domestic
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based assessment gives Improved cook-stoves in Guinea (GS-1244) 6.2 out of 10 (medium confidence) under CarbonMeld methodology v2.2, analysed on 28 Oct 2026. The analysis read 15 of the 15 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.2 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Methodology v2.2 · analysed on 28 Oct 2026

A fact the document-based rating needs was not collected when this page was analysed, so the page keeps its version 2.2 score. Missing: the source of the fNRB value (it was not asked when this page was analysed)

medium confidence

evidence: 15/15 registry documents read · 0 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Gold Standard (GS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
The Gold Standard Simplified Methodology for Efficient Cookstoves How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.2 · analysed on 28 Oct 2026 · 15/15 registry documents read

Analysis

Improved cook-stoves in Guinea (Guinea) distributes efficient cookstoves (Gold Standard simplified methodology) (Improved Cookstoves (ICS)) under The Gold Standard Simplified Methodology for Efficient Cookstoves; registry status Registered (GS), 11,779 credits issued (vintages 2015–2016). The latest verification report (2015-01-01 – 2015-12-31) verifies 3,430 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags in the documents read.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology rejected for some versionsGS The Gold Standard Simplified Methodology

    The Integrity Council rejected some versions of this protocol; other versions are still under assessment: check which version the project uses.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
3,4303,4300
2016
8,3498,3490
Total11,77911,7790

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: the reasons behind the score, the red flags and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Improved cook-stoves in Guinea (GS-1244): CarbonMeld analysis, methodology v2.2, analysed on 28 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/improved-cook-stoves-in-guinea/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and date; the score itself is on this page.

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 15 registry documents (15 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.