Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

Rated

Manoa REDD+ Project

Standard
VCS
Methodology
VM0015 (VCS)
Registry
VCS-1571 ↗ · Registered
Country
Brazil
Credit type
Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use

CarbonMeld's document-based assessment gives Manoa REDD+ Project (VCS-1571) 7.5 out of 10 (medium confidence) under CarbonMeld methodology v2.2, analysed on 30 Oct 2026. The analysis read 34 of the 42 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.5 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Methodology v2.2 · analysed on 30 Oct 2026

A fact the document-based rating needs was not collected when this page was analysed, so the page keeps its version 2.2 score. Missing: the leakage deduction (it is not among the facts read)

Credits issued under this methodology cannot receive the CCP label (ICVCM, 15 Nov 2024).

How this analysis was made

Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.2 · analysed on 30 Oct 2026 · 34/42 registry documents read

Analysis

Manoa REDD+ Project (Brazil) avoids deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) (improved forest management (reduced-impact logging) on lowland open rainforest and submontane open rainforest) under VM0015 v1.1; registry status Registered (VCS), 2,066,898 credits issued (vintages 2013–2024). The documents name EPIC Sustainability Services Private Limited as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (2023-01-01 – 2024-09-30) verifies 2,003,065 tCO2e. The latest achieved amount read is of an earlier period (2017-01-01 – 2020-08-07): 1,046,092 tCO2e, per the monitoring report.

Red Flags

No red flags in the documents read.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No CCP label under this methodology

    Credits issued under this methodology cannot receive the CCP label (ICVCM, 15 Nov 2024).

    Source: ICVCM assessment · read date not recorded

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
76,68776,6870
2014
157,485157,4850
2015
161,048161,0480
2016
95,93495,9340
2017
257,301257,192109
2018
188,174186,4731,701
2019
275,450273,6041,846
2020
323,505308,71414,791
2021
216,756216,7560
2022
214,558194,03220,526
2023
50,00037749,623
2024
50,000050,000
Total2,066,8981,928,302138,596

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+65)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: the reasons behind the score, the red flags and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Manoa REDD+ Project (VCS-1571): CarbonMeld analysis, methodology v2.2, analysed on 30 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/manoa-redd-project/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and date; the score itself is on this page.

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 42 registry documents (34 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.