Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

Archived

MRMPL Wind Power Project

Standard
VCS
Methodology
ACM0002 (CDM)
Registry
VCS-1781 ↗ · Withdrawn from the registry
Country
India
Credit type
avoidance
This project is archived. The registry lists it as «Withdrawn» (read on 1 Nov 2026). Archived projects carry no rating: CarbonMeld's earlier analysis (21 Oct 2026) is no longer shown. The registry data below are kept for reference.

Registry status: withdrawn or not delivered

The project has been taken off the registry, usually at the developer's request: for example because it would not pass validation, moved to another standard or was abandoned. It issues no further credits here.

Only the vintages issued before the change (below) exist on the registry. Verify any resale claim against those vintages.

Verra: “Withdrawn”

Assessment

No rating — archived

This project is archived: archived projects carry no CarbonMeld rating and are no longer analysed. CarbonMeld's earlier analysis (21 Oct 2026) is no longer shown. The registry data and credit vintages below are kept for reference.

Standard and methodology

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 15 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 15 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
20,32619,858468
2013
21,50721,5070
2014
21,34021,3400
2015
18,32818,3280
2016
22,31722,3170
2017
21,47321,4730
2018
23,14523,1450
2019
3,0282,457571
Total151,464150,4251,039

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2012–2018ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2018–2019ACM0002 v10.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Each listing shows what the shop published on the day it was checked. The registry balance on this page is not a seller's stock, and some shops show no price.

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Report an error on this page

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Report an error on this page →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.