Petrobras Wind Power Project for Oil Pumping at Macau, Brazil
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind generation project (2004–2010) with VVB-confirmed additionality and a smart-meter monitoring system, but significant evidence gaps: no verified emission reduction figures are available, the leakage justification is contradictory between the PDD and validation report, and extraction confidence is low. The project is inherently low-risk on permanence (generation, not avoidance), but the absence of monitoring-period verification data limits confidence in the 8,942 tCO₂e lifetime claim.
Red Flags
- Contradiction between PDD (leakage 'deemed negligible') and validation report (leakage 'quantified') while the actual deduction is 0% — the quantified justification is not supported by a non-zero figure
- No verified emission reduction figure (total_err_verified) is available in any document, making the 8,942 tCO₂e lifetime claim unverifiable
- Eleven material findings raised during validation, including unaddressed leakage from transferred diesel engines and undefined monitoring/calibration responsibility, all reportedly resolved but no follow-up verification report confirms closure
- Low extraction confidence indicates at least one key document was poorly readable, reducing reliability of the extracted record
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
Risk Indicators
Combined test, VVB-confirmed
Generation project, no reversal risk
0% deduction, contradictory justification
Project-specific, reassessed 2005
Mentioned but details not documented
CORSIA/CCP status not stated (CDM)
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →