Skip to main content
GSSolar Thermal - ElectricityMalawiGeneral Methodologyv2.0

*SolarAid Microsolar Lanterns Project for Malawi

GS-1697 ↗ · current registry ID: GS393

#6of 9 in Malawi#298of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)

4.8/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
4.0
Claim Safety
5.0
Documentation
4.5

Audit Analysis

The SolarAid Malawi lantern project presents a straightforward small-scale solar application with positive field-level findings (1,635 daily users, 3,679 L kerosene saved monthly), but suffers from significant verification gaps: no VVB is identified, no verified ERR figure exists, and the leakage justification is a bare 'deemed negligible' with no quantification. The project-specific baseline and the internal PDD contradiction on the additionality test type further weaken confidence in the integrity of the claims.

Red Flags

  • No VVB name or verification report found in the extracted record; additionality is not independently confirmed
  • Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis for a project displacing kerosene purchases
  • Internal PDD contradiction: additionality test described as both 'combined' and 'investment' in the same document (2008-04-10)
  • No verified ERR figure available to cross-check against the 19,017.18 tCO₂e lifetime claim
  • Only one year of monitoring data (2008–2009) exists for a 10-year crediting period (2009–2019)

Credit Vintages Exhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2009
35350
Total35350

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test in PDD but no VVB confirmation; internal PDD c

Permanence

No buffer pool or permanence mechanism stated; no reversal e

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only, no quantified analys

Baseline

Project-specific baseline; no reassessment data in record

Safeguards

Safeguards and benefit sharing mentioned; FPIC and grievance

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents