⚠
This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry
data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-08-13).
5.1/ 10
Integrity
5.8
Transparency
4.8
Claim Safety
4.2
Documentation
5.7
Score Breakdown
integrity
transparency
claim_safety
documentation
Detailed Analysis
▼
Integrity
Transparency
Claim Safety
Documentation
Overall
Audit Analysis
The project demonstrates verified additionality but is constrained by significant methodological non-compliances and missing verified performance data. Contradictions across monitoring reports regarding claimed emission reductions and leakage treatment reduce confidence in data reliability, resulting in a moderate overall quality rating.
Project Description
Red Flags
⚠Verified emission reduction totals are entirely missing from the extracted records
⚠Contradictory leakage justification and claimed credit volumes across monitoring reports
Credit Vintages
Issued
Retired
Available
2012
20,095
0
20,095
2014
11,331
0
11,331
2015
9,525
0
9,525
2016
8,311
0
8,311
2020
31,925
0
31,925
Total
81,187
0
81,187
What would improve this score
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.
Risk Indicators
Additionality
VVB-confirmed combined test
Permanence
Low reversal risk, no buffer documented
Leakage
Zero deduction with contradictory justification
Baseline
Project-specific, last reassessed 2014
Safeguards
Mentioned but FPIC/grievance details missing
Double-claim
CORSIA/CCP status not stated
Source: CarbonMeld — independent carbon credit market intelligence. Quality scores and document-based audits for 15,000+ projects: carbonmeld.com