Suloglu Wind Power Plant, Turkey
Developer: Entek Elektrik Üretimi A.Ş
GS-493 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2763
#3044of 4744 in Renewable energy#324of 413 in Türkiye#1193of 2179 in Gold Standard (GS)#2190of 3246 in ACM0002
Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 6 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.
Assessment
Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.
Findings
Risk Indicators
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
🔒
Score Breakdown
Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Gates applied
The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Detailed Analysis
The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium
Evidence
Eligibility & market
What can you claim with this credit?
Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).
Airlines (CORSIA)
No CORSIA label on the registry
Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.
Source: registry label · read on 4 Oct 2026
Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002
The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.
Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026
Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits
Removal or reduction
Emission reduction or avoidance
Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.
Source: registry label · read on 4 Oct 2026
Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
Not published
This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.
Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.
Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 22,145 | 22,145 | 0 | |
| 2016 | 115,906 | 115,338 | 568 | |
| 2017 | 112,407 | 112,407 | 0 | |
| 2018 | 126,227 | 120,647 | 5,580 | |
| 2019 | 119,011 | 38,094 | 80,917 | |
| 2020 | 124,435 | 0 | 124,435 | |
| 2021 | 120,932 | 0 | 120,932 | |
| 2022 | 91,449 | 19,508 | 71,941 | |
| Total | 832,512 | 428,139 | 404,373 |
Methodology versions used
The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.
2015–2017ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on
2017–2019ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on
2019–2022ACM0002 v16.0since replaced by v22.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on
- ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.
Retired by
- Vattenfall Europe Sales GmbH75,000 t
- YAPI VE KREDİ BANKASI A.Ş18,239 t
- Vattenfall Real Estate Energy Sales GmbH2,300 t
- YAPI KREDİ BANK AZARBAYCAN QSC546 t
- Climate Reality Project452 t
- YAPI KREDİ YATIRIM MENKUL DEĞERLER A.Ş170 t
- YAPI KREDİ FAKTORİNG A.Ş157 t
- YAPI KREDİ FİNANSAL KİRALAMA A.Ş150 t
- YAPI KREDİ KÜLTÜR SANAT YAYINCILIK TİC. SAN. A.Ş119 t
- YAPI KREDİ PORTFOY YÖNETİMİ A.Ş74 t
Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+3)
Where to buy
Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →
+ Know where to buy this?
Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].
Profile & governance
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Contest this rating
Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.
Contest this rating →Share this rating
Similar projects
Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.