Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

AR-AM0004 — Reforestation or afforestation of land currently under agricultural use

About this methodology

Projects establish or restore forests on degraded land that would otherwise remain degraded. The method measures net CO2 removal from increases in the included carbon stocks.

Last published version
4.0 · source ·
Status
Withdrawn at CDM / UNFCCC · source ·
Climate outcome
CO2 removals
Activity
Forestry
Official page
cdm.unfccc.int ·

How methodology v3 reads projects of this type

What CarbonMeld reads

  • shown

    Buffer pool: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases. CarbonMeld reads it in the project's documents. It does not apply to CDM projects. Our current method never counts it as a gap for them. At the listing stage (under development), Verra asks a draft project description without its non-permanence risk section (Verra, «Registration and Issuance Process» v4.6, 16 Oct 2024, §3.1.3, p7). CarbonMeld then adds no buffer flag. CM-F-ARR-BUFFER

    Link
  • A confirmed investment analysis A-INVEST

    The documents show a project-level additionality test, the validation confirmed it, and it is an investment analysis (a numeric test of the project's finances with and without carbon revenue).

  • Leakage not addressed (forest and land) Q-LEAKAGE-NOT-ADDRESSED

    Forest, wetland, peat, grassland and soil carbon: the documents read do not address leakage. Outside REDD+ and reforestation, the rule applies only where the methodology requires a leakage assessment. At the listing stage, the rule does not apply if the programme's listing form has no section on leakage. CarbonMeld applies this rule only where a check of the documents has confirmed its condition; without that check, the rule takes no points.

  • Where carbon is stored: the permanence start P-START

    CarbonMeld scores permanence only for projects that store carbon. Forest projects start from CCQI's grade of the programme on criterion 3.2. CCQI grades this criterion by programme, so its grade applies to every methodology of the programme. Where CCQI does not grade the programme, permanence starts at the neutral 5.0: the CDM's grade does not stand in for another programme's approach to permanence. Direct air capture with storage, biogenic emissions capture with storage, other geological storage and biochar start at the top, 8.0. The EU classes these types as permanent carbon removals. Enhanced weathering also starts at 8.0. It shares a family with direct air capture. This start is our own judgement. Concrete carbonation, ocean alkalinity, buried biomass and long-lived materials start at the neutral 5.0. These types have no class in a public source.

    Forests: CCQI's grade of the programme.

Set by the methodology or the programme, not assessed by our current method

  • not assessed

    No legal requirement for the activity: the methodology sets rules for it in some cases (VM0047 §7, p. 13). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-ARR-REGULATORY-SURPLUS

    Link
  • not assessed

    Social safeguards and consent of communities (FPIC): any such rules come from the programme, not the methodology (GS LUF v1.2.1, p. 14). Our current method does not assess it. CM-F-ARR-SAFEGUARDS-FPIC

    Link

Not applicable to this type — never a gap in our current method

The criterion does not apply to this methodology. Our current method never counts it as a gap.

The general rules apply as well. Read the general rules.

The rules of methodology v2.2, as they were: the archived v2.2 page.

History and transitions

All 4 versions
  • v04adopted 16 Oct 2009source

    Application of the guidance covered by paragraph 37 of the report of the EB 44 meeting with respect to insignificant GHG emissions from selected sources related to A/R CDM project activities.

  • v03adopted 26 Sept 2008source

    Revisions mainly in the following sections: Section II. Baseline methodology 7.2 Estimation of GHGE (increase in GHG emissions by sources within the project boundary as a result of the implementation of an A/R CDM project activity) 8 …

  • v02adopted 30 Nov 2007source

    Inclusion of the guidance on the application of the definition of the project boundary in A/R CDM project activities, in accordance with decision 5/CMP.1.

  • v01adopted 29 Sept 2006source

    Initial adoption.

Projects using AR-AM0004

Browse 11 published projects using AR-AM0004, listed alphabetically. There is no ranking for this methodology yet: it appears here automatically once 5 of its projects not in the pipeline or under validation are rated. Open a project to view its registry details and the analysis available for that project.

Which registries list projects under AR-AM0004?

In CarbonMeld's data, AR-AM0004 projects are on one registry: CDM (11 projects, 5 registered).

RegistryProjectsRegisteredProjects list
CDM (UNFCCC)115See the list

Counts of project records in CarbonMeld's data, with or without a CarbonMeld analysis. «Registered» counts the records whose current registry status is «registered», as last read (14 November 2026); projects in a later status, such as awaiting verification approval, late to verify or completed, are not in that column.

← All leaderboards · Full database