CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Rankings · methodology

Top AR-AMS0001 projects

12 rated projects in this methodology · average score 4.5/10 · ranked by CarbonMeld's document-based assessment scores across all four dimensions: integrity, transparency, claim safety and documentation.

← All leaderboards · Full database

#1TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 009VCSKenyaSoil carbonRegistry: Registered5.2/10▼-0.2#2TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 004VCSKenyaSoil carbonRegistry: Verification overdue5/10▲+0.7#3TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 006VCSKenyaSoil carbonRegistry: Registered5/10▲+0.6
  1. 4
    TIST Program in Uganda, VCS 005VCSUgandaSoil carbonRegistry: Registered
    5▲+0.1
  2. 5
    Rehabilitation of Degraded Wastelands at Deramandi in Southern District of National Capital Territory of Delhi through ReforestationCDMIndiaARR (afforestation)Registry: Registered
    4.8▲+3.6
  3. 6
    TIST Program in India, VCS-001VCSIndiaSoil carbonRegistry: Registered
    4.8▼-0.5
  4. 7
    TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 003VCSKenyaSoil carbonRegistry: Verification overdue
    4.6▲+0.1
  5. 8
    Small Scale Cooperative Afforestation CDM Pilot Project Activity on Private Lands Affected by Shifting Sand Dunes in Sirsa, HaryanaCDMIndiaARR (afforestation)Registry: Registered
    4.4
  6. 9
    TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 002VCSKenyaSoil carbonRegistry: Verification overdue
    4▼-1.9
  7. 10
    CARBON SEQUESTRATION THROUGH REFORESTATION IN THE BOLIVIAN TROPICS BY SMALLHOLDERS OF “The Federación de Comunidades Agropecuarias de Rurrenabaque (FECAR)”CDMBoliviaARR (afforestation)Registry: Registered
    3.9
  8. 11
    TIST Program in Kenya, VCS 001VCSKenyaSoil carbonRegistry: Verification overdue
    3.6▼-1.4
  9. 12
    ArBolivia- Phase II GSBoliviaARR (afforestation)Registry: Registered
    3.1▲+0.7

Rank is by document-based assessment score only. The registry status shown next to each project is a separate fact: inclusion in this ranking is not a statement of current validity or credit eligibility — projects suspended, withdrawn or terminated by their registry can still appear, with their status labelled. Read the methodology.