Skip to main content
CDMWindIndiaACM0002

50.4 MW wind power project by EN Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd

CDM-4364 ↗

#207of 770 in Renewable energy#133of 387 in India#43of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#164of 383 in ACM0002

5.6/ 10
Integrity
5.5
Transparency
5.5
Claim Safety
6.0
Documentation
5.5

Audit Analysis

A 50.4 MW wind power project in India under CDM with an investment additionality test and a reputable VVB (TÜV SÜD), but the record is marred by three material administrative findings, three inter-document contradictions (leakage justification, ERR figures, and baseline method), and several key fields not stated in available documents. The project is inherently low-risk on permanence as an avoidance-type wind project, and the monitoring-period ERR of 216,117 tCO₂e represents roughly 75% of the pro-rata lifetime expectation, indicating conservative delivery. Overall a mid-range project with documentation quality concerns that temper confidence.

Red Flags

  • Three material findings in the monitoring report: host country listed as Spain instead of India, methodology applicability criteria not aligned with version 20, and flow diagram misidentifying the grid as Southern Grid
  • Contradiction on baseline method: the validation report (Sep 2020) states a jurisdictional baseline while the monitoring report (Feb 2021) describes a project-specific baseline
  • Leakage justification is inconsistent across documents — the PDD (Nov 2020) deems leakage negligible while the monitoring report (Feb 2021) states it was quantified, yet the deduction is 0%
  • Total verified ERR for the monitoring period is not stated in the extracted record; only the claimed figure of 216,117 tCO₂e is available

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2012
56,413056,413
2013
102,5980102,598
2021
617,4290617,429
Total776,4400776,440

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Investment test present; VVB confirmation not confirmed in r

Permanence

Avoidance-type wind; no reversal risk or events reported

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent across PDD and moni

Baseline

Contradiction: jurisdictional (validation) vs project (monit

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned; FPIC and grievance mechanism not confi

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-25ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents