Skip to main content
CDMHydroSouth AfricaAMS-I.D

Bethlehem Hydroelectric project

CDM-2692 ↗

#123of 770 in Renewable energy#3of 12 in South Africa#21of 213 in CDM (UNFCCC)#38of 417 in AMS-I.D

6.1/ 10
Integrity
6.2
Transparency
6.0
Claim Safety
6.3
Documentation
5.8

Audit Analysis

The Bethlehem Hydroelectric project is a small-scale (2.4+3.4 MW) CDM hydro project in South Africa with a VVB-confirmed barrier additionality test and an appropriate grid-based baseline. However, the verification process surfaced ten material findings—including a ~25% overstatement of design capacity and inclusion of non-functional diesel generators in the monitoring plan—indicating meaningful data-integrity issues that were corrected but erode confidence in the original PDD. The project delivered approximately 115% of the pro-rata PDD expectation for the elapsed monitoring period, with no evidence of over-crediting.

Red Flags

  • Design capacity was initially overstated (3+4 MW vs. corrected 2.4+3.4 MW) due to a power-factor calculation error, inflating the original PDD ERR estimate
  • Non-functional backup diesel generators were included in the project sites and monitoring plan before being removed during verification
  • Baseline method is described inconsistently across documents: the validation report (2016) calls it jurisdictional while the monitoring report (2020) labels it project-specific
  • No buffer pool percentage is stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified
  • Grid emission factor is from 2013 and no updated value is referenced in the monitoring report

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2014
93,900093,900
2017
111,4910111,491
2022
161,3460161,346
Total366,7370366,737

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed barrier test

Permanence

No buffer pool stated; low reversal risk for hydro

Leakage

0% quantified, appropriate for small hydro

Baseline

Grid-based but method label inconsistent across docs; EF fro

Safeguards

Mentioned with benefit sharing; FPIC and grievance mechanism

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-26AMS-I.D

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents