Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Re-assessment pendingVCSavoidanceIndiaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Bundled Wind Power Project by Sembcorp Green Infra Limited in India

Developer: SEMBCORP GREEN INFRA LIMITED

VCS-1856 ↗

#43of 4737 in Renewable energy#26of 2757 in India#43of 1612 in Verra (VCS)#46of 3242 in ACM0002

The project's documents changed since this analysis (analysis of 11 Oct 2026). Re-assessment pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 7.9 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.2

Analysis

Bundled Wind Power Project by Sembcorp Green Infra Limited in India (India) generates grid-connected renewable electricity (wind, 56 WTGs (11 x 2MW, 12 x 2MW, 33 x 1.5MW) = 95.5 MW) under ACM0002 version 19; registry status Issuance requested (VCS), 1,341,057 credits issued (vintages 2017–2025). The documents name LGAI Technological Center S.A as validation body and LGAI Technological Center S.A (2017-03-02 – 2018-12-31, 2021-08-01 – 2022-07-31, 2022-08-01 – 2023-08-31), Earthood Services Private Limited (2019-01-01 – 2020-07-31, 2020-08-01 – 2021-07-31), Carbon Check India Pvt.Ltd (2023-09-01 – 2024-04-30), EcoLance Private Limited (2024-05-01 – 2025-02-28) as verification bodies. The latest verification report (01-May-2024 – 28-February-2025) verifies 155,226 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags detected.

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 11 Oct 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 30 registry documents (23 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-11-01

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2017
103,868103,8680
2018
117,158117,1580
2019
191,3270191,327
2020
172,23769,390102,847
2021
180,00776,797103,210
2022
181,568625180,943
2023
190,914108,48582,429
2024
181,70970,091111,618
2025
22,26911,53610,733
Total1,341,057557,950783,107

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2017–2018ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2019–2020ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2020–2021ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2021–2022ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2022–2023ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2023–2024ACM0002version not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  7. 2024–2025ACM0002 v19.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002 version 19

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.