CECIC HKC Danjinghe Wind Farm Project
#1199of 1935 in Renewable energy#704of 1084 in China#910of 1459 in CDM (UNFCCC)#934of 1287 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
A CDM wind farm project in China with a 7-year crediting period, verified by a named VVB, but the extracted record contains a material finding on grid emission factor inconsistency, a contradiction in baseline classification between the validation report and monitoring report, and no documented additionality test details. The project is inherently low-risk as an avoidance-type renewable energy project, but data quality issues and evidence gaps prevent a higher confidence rating.
Red Flags
- Material finding: the grid emission factor (EFgrid,BM,y) in the PDD and ER calculation spreadsheet differed from the value provided by China's Designated National Authority, requiring corrective recalculation of emission reductions
- Baseline method is classified as 'project' in the 2020 monitoring report but 'jurisdictional' in the 2015 validation report — an unresolved contradiction that affects baseline credibility
- Additionality test type and VVB verification status are not found in the extracted record, leaving a gap in the additionality evidence chain
- Leakage justification is inconsistent: the PDD (2015) states leakage was deemed negligible, while the 2020 monitoring report records it as not addressed
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 31,556 | 0 | 31,556 | |
| 2010 | 157,159 | 0 | 157,159 | |
| 2011 | 367,518 | 0 | 367,518 | |
| 2012 | 443,700 | 0 | 443,700 | |
| 2013 | 431,351 | 0 | 431,351 | |
| 2015 | 1,174,545 | 0 | 1,174,545 | |
| 2019 | 893,455 | 0 | 893,455 | |
| 2021 | 792,394 | 0 | 792,394 | |
| Total | 4,291,678 | 0 | 4,291,678 |
Risk Indicators
Test type and VVB confirmation not found in extracted record
Avoidance project, no reversal risk or events reported
0% deduction reasonable but justification inconsistent acros
Method contradiction between validation and monitoring repor
Safeguards mentioned but FPIC and grievance mechanism detail
CORSIA and CCP statuses not stated in available documents
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
