Community Level Green Energy Promotion in Nepal VPA-01
GS-1784 ↗ · current registry ID: GS6887
#32of 202 in Industrial#4of 14 in Nepal#103of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)
Audit Analysis
A Gold Standard community-level energy efficiency project in Nepal with VVB-confirmed additionality and no reported reversals, but undermined by a project-specific baseline, absence of a stated buffer pool, a 0% leakage deduction with only a 'deemed negligible' justification, and a heavy load of 22 corrective action requests and 15 clarification requests across the validation and verification cycle. The project over-delivered relative to its pro-rata expectation, which is a positive signal, but the volume of unresolved documentation issues and internal contradictions in reporting methods reduce confidence in the robustness of the claims.
Red Flags
- 22 Corrective Action Requests and 15 Clarification Requests logged across validation and verification, indicating systemic documentation and methodology gaps
- No buffer pool percentage stated in any available document, leaving permanence risk unquantified
- Leakage deduction of 0% justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, while a later monitoring report references a 'quantified' justification — an unresolved inconsistency
- Two different lifetime ERR figures (61,947 and 23,118) appear in successive monitoring reports, raising questions about the stability of the ex-ante estimate
- Usage monitoring method is described as 'annual_survey' in the verification report but 'assumed' in a later monitoring report, creating ambiguity about whether usage is actually measured
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3,773 | 3,773 | 0 | |
| 2022 | 19,345 | 17,875 | 1,470 | |
| Total | 23,118 | 21,648 | 1,470 |
Risk Indicators
VVB-confirmed combined test
No buffer pool stated; avoidance type mitigates risk
0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' only; contradictory justif
Project-specific baseline; reassessment timing not stated
FPIC and grievance mechanism present; safeguarding assessmen
CORSIA not stated; CCP not mentioned; dual-channel risk not
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →