CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Cupisnique Wind Farm Project

Standard
CDM
Methodology
ACM0002 (CDM)
Registry
CDM-7487 ↗ · Registered
Country
Peru
Credit type
Wind
Developer
Energía Eólica S.A
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Cupisnique Wind Farm Project (CDM-7487) 3.4 out of 10 (Very low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 29 Oct 2026. The analysis read 6 of the 8 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

010203 Document-based rating 3.4 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

3.4/10

Very low rating (under 3.5)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 29 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI grades version 21 of this methodology)
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that raised the number: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted in the number

  • The vintage: the registry records we hold show no issuance
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 29 Oct 2026Latest monitoring period ends:

evidence: 6/8 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
CDM (UNFCCC) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
ACM0002 version 12.3.0 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 29 Oct 2026 · 6/8 registry documents read

Analysis

Cupisnique Wind Farm Project (Peru) generates grid-connected renewable electricity under ACM0002 version 12.3.0; registry status Registered (CDM), issuance not captured in the registry data (not stated, not zero). The documents name PERRY JOHNSON REGISTRAR CARBON EMISSIONS SERVICES, INC as validation / verification body. The documents estimate 214,944 tCO2e per year. The latest monitoring report (2013-06-20 – 2020-06-19) reports 768,156 tCO2e achieved. The latest monitoring period achieved 51% of its ex-ante estimate (per the monitoring report; no issuance in the registry data).

Eligibility & market

Under decision 4/CMP.20 of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (FCCC/KP/CMP/2025/7/Add.1, paragraph 5), the submission of requests for issuance of new CERs was discontinued as of 30 June 2026; requests to transfer CERs to the Article 6.4 mechanism registry, cancellations and any other transactions in the CDM registry are discontinued as of 31 December 2026. This page keeps the project's record and our analysis.

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2013–2020ACM0002 v12.3since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Cupisnique Wind Farm Project (CDM-7487): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 29 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/cupisnique-wind-farm-project/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 8 registry documents (6 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.