Gunder Hydro Power Project, Turkey
#49of 121 in Turkey#230of 629 in Verra (VCS)#158of 383 in ACM0002
Audit Analysis
Evidence scope is partial: the registry-linked validation report is public, but the available documents are old and I do not see a recent monitoring/verification cycle. The project has some audited support for additionality and compliance, but claim safety is limited by age and the lack of recent public MRV.
Red Flags
- Third-party evidence is dated (validation report from 2012); no recent public monitoring/verification cycle visible
- No public evidence of issuance/retirement history or buyer claim guidance in the materials provided
- No evidence of CCP eligibility, Article 6 authorization, or corresponding adjustment
Credit Vintages
| Issued | Retired | Available | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 11,634 | 489 | 11,145 | |
| 2013 | 30,371 | 5,201 | 25,170 | |
| 2014 | 16,617 | 1,515 | 15,102 | |
| 2015 | 30,496 | 600 | 29,896 | |
| 2016 | 17,957 | 190 | 17,767 | |
| 2017 | 33,557 | 0 | 33,557 | |
| 2018 | 27,795 | 0 | 27,795 | |
| 2019 | 45,537 | 600 | 44,937 | |
| 2020 | 37,591 | 6,899 | 30,692 | |
| 2021 | 19,447 | 14,384 | 5,063 | |
| Total | 271,002 | 29,878 | 241,124 |
Risk Indicators
documented evidence
low reversal risk for run-of-river hydro
no major leakage issue evident
baseline methodology identified, but not recently reassessed
some environmental/social validation, but limited current MR
registry framework present, but claim authorization evidence
⚑ Dispute this rating
Are you the project owner?
Metadata correction (free)
Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.
Does not modify the score.
[email protected] →Pipeline re-run with new documents
Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.
Submit Documents →Share this rating
