CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Jiangxi Province Le'An County Forest Farm Carbon Sink Project

Standard
VCS
Methodology
VM0010 (VCS)
Registry
VCS-1162 ↗ · Rejected by the registry
Country
China
Credit type
Forestry
Developer
Beijing Shengdahuitong Carbon Management Co., Ltd
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Jiangxi Province Le'An County Forest Farm Carbon Sink Project (VCS-1162) 0.0 out of 10 (Very low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 16 Oct 2026. The analysis read 18 of the 21 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Registry status: rejected

The registry rejected the project or one of its requests (registration, crediting-period renewal): it did not meet the standard's rules. No new credits can be issued under this status.

Only the vintages issued before the change (below) exist on the registry. Verify any resale claim against those vintages.

Verra: “Rejected by Administrator”

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

01020304 Document-based rating 0.0 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Permanence 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

0.0/10

Very low rating (under 3.5)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 16 Oct 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project
  • Permanence: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI grades permanence by programme: this is its grade of the project's programme)
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that raised the number: 1

Rules that lowered the number: 2

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Negative facts

  • Registry status: rejected

Not counted in the number

  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 16 Oct 2026Latest verified period ends:

evidence: 18/21 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
VM0010 v1.2 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 16 Oct 2026 · 18/21 registry documents read

Analysis

Jiangxi Province Le'An County Forest Farm Carbon Sink Project (China) improves forest management to increase carbon stocks (VCS IFM) (Improved Forest Management: Conversion from Logged to Protected Forest (Slash Pine and Chinese Fir)) under VM0010 v1.2; registry status Rejected by the registry (VCS), 474,446 credits issued (vintages 2006–2016). The documents name Bureau Veritas Certification as validation body and Bureau Veritas Certification (2006-01-01 – 2009-12-31), China Quality Certification Centre (2010-01-01 – 2016-12-31) as verification bodies. Project area: 7,747 ha. The documents estimate 86,680 tCO2e per year. The latest verification report (01/01/2010 – 31/12/2016) verifies 383,901 tCO2e.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 15 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology under ICVCM assessmentVM0010

    The Integrity Council has not decided on this methodology yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 15 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
90,54582,3468,199
2010
54,84348,4326,411
2011
54,84325,10229,741
2012
54,84354,8430
2013
54,84354,8430
2014
54,84354,8430
2015
54,84342,86511,978
2016
54,84351,5293,314
Total474,446414,80359,643

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2006–2009VM0010 v1.2since replaced by v1.4

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2010–2016VM0010 v1.2since replaced by v1.4

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • VM0010: Active (Verra / Verified Carbon Standard) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+58)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Each listing shows what the shop published on the day it was checked. The registry balance on this page is not a seller's stock, and some shops show no price.

Carbonmarksold out

checked on 12 Nov 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Jiangxi Province Le'An County Forest Farm Carbon Sink Project (VCS-1162): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 16 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/jiangxi-province-le-an-county-forest-farm-carbon-sink-project/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 21 registry documents (18 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.