CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Rated

Proyecto de mitigación en el sector del uso del suelo cambio en el uso del suelo y silvicultura por remociones debidas al establecimiento de sistemas forestales de Hevea brasiliensis en los municipios de Sucre y el Peñón Santander, Colombia.

Standard
CC
Methodology
AR-ACM0003 (CDM)
Registry
ECO-27 ↗ · Issuance requested
Country
Colombia
Credit type
Land use (AFOLU)
Developer
GRUPO ANDINO MARIN VALENCIA INDUSTRIA AGRICOLA S.A
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Proyecto de mitigación en el sector del uso del suelo cambio en el uso del suelo y silvicultura por remociones debidas al establecimiento de sistemas forestales de Hevea brasiliensis en los municipios de Sucre y el Peñón Santander, Colombia. (ECO-27) 4.7 out of 10 (Low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 10 Nov 2026. The analysis read 22 of the 22 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

01020304 Document-based rating 4.7 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Permanence 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

4.7/10

Low rating (3.5 to 4.9)

Evidence coverage: medium

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 10 Nov 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme) (CCQI does not grade this programme for this type of project: the CDM grade is used)
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme) (CCQI does not grade this programme for this type of project: the CDM grade is used)
  • Permanence: neutral (5.0) — CCQI does not grade this programme's approach to permanence
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that lowered the number: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted in the number

  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 10 Nov 2026Latest verified period ends:

evidence: 22/22 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
CerCarbono (CC)
Methodology
AR-ACM0003: Afforestation and reforestation of lands except wetlands Version 2.0 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 10 Nov 2026 · 22/22 registry documents read

Analysis

Proyecto de mitigación en el sector del uso del suelo cambio en el uso del suelo y silvicultura por remociones debidas al establecimiento de sistemas forestales de Hevea brasiliensis en los municipios de Sucre y el Peñón Santander, Colombia (Colombia) plants or regenerates trees (afforestation, reforestation, revegetation) (Afforestation and reforestation of Hevea Brasiliensis plantations) under AR-ACM0003: Afforestation and reforestation of lands except wetlands Version 2.0; registry status Issuance requested (ECO), 15,637 credits issued (vintages 2011–2019). The documents name ICONTEC as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (2011-01-02 – 2019-06-08) verifies 18,396 tCO2e.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish CORSIA eligibility per project.

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit VintagesExhausted

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2011
1631630
2012
4674670
2013
9529520
2014
1,5551,5550
2015
2,2342,2340
2016
2,8652,8650
2017
3,4413,4410
2018
2,7492,7490
2019
1,2111,2110
Total15,63715,6370

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2011–2019AR-ACM0003 v2.0current version

    verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • AR-ACM0003: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Proyecto de mitigación en el sector del uso del suelo cambio en el uso del suelo y silvicultura por remociones debidas al establecimiento de sistemas forestales de Hevea brasiliensis en los municipios de Sucre y el Peñón Santander, Colombia. (ECO-27): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 10 Nov 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/proyecto-de-mitigaci-n-en-el-sector-del-uso-del-suelo-cambio-en-el-uso-del-suelo-eco-27/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 22 registry documents (22 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.