CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index BuyersCORSIA supplyCheck an offerAPI & MCP Method About the System Editorial Policy Score Your Project
EN
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
← All projects
ScoredPURremovalAustraliaGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Pyrocal - Wellcamp

Developer: Pyrocal Pty Ltd – Wellcamp

PUR-569274 ↗

#152of 173 in Biochar#10of 12 in Australia#97of 112 in Puro.earth (PUR)

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 3.6 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Scored2026-09-03high confidenceLatest verified monitoring: 2022-04-30

evidence:7/7registry documents analyzed · 5red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Analysis

The Pyrocal Wellcamp biochar project has a verified additionality assessment and a buffer pool in place, but the verification report (September 2024) identified eight material findings including a 70% overstatement of biochar yield in the LCA, use of theoretical rather than actual data, and volume-based quantification instead of measured mass. Thirteen corrective actions were required, and the ERR figures in the issuance document (31 tCO₂e) are less than half the verified figure (63 tCO₂e) with no clear explanation for the gap beyond the 2.5% buffer pool. The overall data quality and quantification rigour raise serious concerns about the accuracy of the claimed removals.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    Not stated as eligible

    The project documents do not claim CORSIA eligibility.

    Source: project documents (not confirmed by the registry)

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Carbon removal

    Takes CO₂ out of the atmosphere — the only type that can neutralise residual emissions in an SBTi net-zero claim.

    Source: project standard

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2021
70700
2022
31031
2023
63063
2024
63630
Total22713394

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Carbonmarksold out
↗
Toucan Protocolsold out

Vintage 2021, 2022

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceGeneral Methodologyv2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →