Skip to main content
ICRAvoidance / ReductionIQGeneral Methodologyv2.0

SHATT AL-BASRA Combined Cycle Power Plant

ICR-391 ↗

#201of 202 in Industrial#28of 32 in Intl. Carbon Registry (ICR)

0.8/ 10
Integrity
1.0
Transparency
0.0
Claim Safety
1.0
Documentation
1.0

Audit Analysis

The Shatt Al-Basrah Combined Cycle Power Plant (ICR-391, Iraq) presents a near-total evidence gap: no additionality test, baseline method, leakage treatment, buffer pool, or monitoring data could be extracted from the available documents. With low extraction confidence, an unknown document type, and no identifiable verification body, the project's environmental integrity and claim safety cannot be assessed at any meaningful level.

Red Flags

  • No additionality assessment, baseline methodology, or leakage treatment found in any available document — the core integrity pillars are entirely unverified
  • Extraction confidence is low and the document type is listed as 'unknown', meaning the two source documents could not be reliably read or classified
  • No verification body (VVB) is identified, leaving no independent assurance of the project's claims
  • No monitoring period, crediting period, or ERR figures (claimed or verified) are available, making over- or under-crediting risk completely unassessable

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2022
2,997,55202,997,552
2023
3,451,44003,451,440
2024
3,451,44003,451,440
2025
3,451,44003,451,440
2026
3,451,44003,451,440
2027
3,451,44003,451,440
2028
3,451,44003,451,440
2029
3,451,44003,451,440
2030
3,451,44003,451,440
2031
3,451,44003,451,440
2032
453,8880453,888
Total34,514,400034,514,400

Risk Indicators

Additionality

No additionality assessment found

Permanence

No buffer pool or reversal data

Leakage

No leakage treatment documented

Baseline

No baseline method or reassessment found

Safeguards

No safeguards, FPIC, or grievance mechanism found

Double-claim

CCP and CORSIA status not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-18General Methodology v2.0

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents