Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

Re-assessment pending

Chol Charoen Group Wastewater Treatment with Biogas System I (Cholburi)

Standard
VCS
Registry
VCS-430 ↗ · Registered
Country
Thailand
Credit type
Waste handling and disposal

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 9 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.4 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

How this analysis was made

Methodology
AMS-III.H v18.0, AMS-I.C v20.0, AMS-I.D v18.0 No methodology-specific rules: the general rules apply. Read the general rules
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 9 Sep 2026 · 60/60 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

A long-running Thai wastewater-to-biogas project with VVB-confirmed additionality and a reasonable pro-rata delivery rate (87% of expectation), but plagued by chronic MRV weaknesses including repeated calibration gaps, missing monitoring data, and dozens of corrective actions across multiple verification cycles. The project-specific modeled baseline, absence of FPIC, and low document extraction confidence further erode confidence in the credit quality.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 9 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 60 registry documents (60 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
11,05611,0560
2008
13,65413,6540
2009
19,88819,8880
2010
40,46440,4640
2011
43,76543,7650
2012
71,47671,4760
2013
44,32143,1131,208
2014
45,56045,5600
2015
49,10549,1050
2016
30,81730,8170
2017
29,79629,7960
2018
48,06148,0610
2019
59,80059,8000
2020
45,94745,9470
2021
11,9984,2927,706
Total565,708556,7948,914

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2007–2008AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2007–2008AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2007–2008AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2009–2010AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2009–2010AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2009–2010AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2010–2011AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2010–2011AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2010–2011AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  10. 2012–2014AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  11. 2012–2014AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  12. 2012–2014AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  13. 2012–2014AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  14. 2012–2014AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  15. 2012–2014AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  16. 2014AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  17. 2014AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  18. 2014AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  19. 2014–2016AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  20. 2014–2016AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  21. 2014–2016AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  22. 2016AMS-I.C v15.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  23. 2016AMS-I.D v14.0since replaced by v18.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  24. 2016AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  25. 2017AMS-I.Cversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  26. 2017AMS-I.Dversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  27. 2017AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  28. 2018–2019AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  29. 2018–2019AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  30. 2018–2019AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  31. 2019AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  32. 2019AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  33. 2019AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  34. 2020AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  35. 2020AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  36. 2020AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  37. 2020–2021AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  38. 2020–2021AMS-I.D v18.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  39. 2020–2021AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  40. 2021–2022AMS-I.C v20.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.C: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-I.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.H: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.