Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Re-assessment pendingGSWindIndiaVintage 2022Registry: RegisteredACM0002

Grid Connected Wind Power Project In Maharashtra, India By Bhilwara

Developer: CLEAN SOLAR POWER (BHADLA) PRIVATE LIMITED

GS-654 ↗ · current registry ID: GS3705

#3656of 4744 in Renewable energy#1918of 2759 in India#1469of 2179 in Gold Standard (GS)#2577of 3246 in ACM0002

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 5 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.9 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

How this analysis was made

Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 5 Sep 2026 · 19/21 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

A grid-connected wind project in Maharashtra with VVB-confirmed additionality via an investment test and no reversal events, but undermined by a project-specific baseline, contradictory leakage justifications across documents, and a large volume of corrective actions indicating weak initial monitoring-report quality. The 42.36% over-delivery versus ex-ante estimates was appropriately capped at the +10% PLF sensitivity bound, which is a positive safeguard, yet the unresolved contradictions in ERR figures and baseline method reduce confidence in the overall data integrity.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 5 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 21 registry documents (19 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 2 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-11-02

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
12,767012,767
2014
90,1514590,106
2015
93,976093,976
2016
150,71253,84796,865
2017
107,17319,24187,932
2018
160,92055,024105,896
2019
166,77264,528102,244
2020
117,06716,824100,243
2021
84,29977,0007,299
2022
81,16734,93546,232
Total1,065,004321,444743,560

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2013–2018ACM0002 v12.2since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2018–2020ACM0002 v12.2since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2020–2022ACM0002 v12.2since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2022ACM0002 v12.2since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • ACM0002: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+26)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Each listing shows what the shop published on the day it was checked. The registry balance on this page is not a seller's stock, and some shops show no price.

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.