CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
Re-assessment pendingGSEnergy Efficiency - DomesticUgandaRegistry: RegisteredGS-TPDDTEC

Impact Carbon and myclimate Safe Water and Improved Cookstoves Global PoA - Uganda VPA

Developer: Impact Carbon

Methodology: GS-TPDDTEC (GS)

GS-314 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2296

Worked comparison example (English)

#1346of 1699 in Industrial#150of 185 in Uganda#1793of 2179 in Gold Standard (GS)#350of 474 in GS-TPDDTEC

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 5 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-05medium confidence

evidence: 41/43 registry documents analyzed · 5 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Gold Standard (GS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
Technologies and Practices to Displace Decentralized Thermal Energy Consumption How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 5 Sep 2026 · 41/43 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

This Gold Standard energy-efficiency project (improved cookstoves and water purifiers in Uganda) has been operating since 2013 and is in its second crediting period. The latest verification report (July 2026) confirms cumulative emissions reductions of 843,008 tCO₂e, but the verification process surfaced over 30 material findings and corrective actions, numerous parameter contradictions across documents, and a low extraction confidence rating. The project's avoidance-type design limits permanence risk, but the volume of data inconsistencies and the shift from a 5% to a 0% leakage deduction warrant caution.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 5 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 43 registry documents (41 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology approved by ICVCMGS TPDDTEC

    The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 4 Oct 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2013
1241240
2014
2,0122,0120
2015
26,32925,872457
2016
55,55455,5540
2017
54,28954,2890
2018
51,31251,3120
2019
154,749134,93219,817
2020
192,543149,75842,785
2021
218,374131,72386,651
2022
558,502378,197180,305
2023
626,468513,063113,405
2024
806,459121,990684,469
2025
485,6550485,655
Total3,232,3701,618,8261,613,544

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+27)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.