CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index
Re-assessment pendingVCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalNetherlandsVintage 2012Registry: Issuance requested

Methane Recovery Project Princepeel Wilbertoord, North Brabant, The Netherlands

Developer: B.V. Landgoed de Princepeel

VCS-337 ↗

Worked comparison example (English)

#3of 9 in Netherlands#963of 1615 in Verra (VCS)

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 3 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 5.5 / 10
Integrity 🔒 Transparency 🔒 Claim Safety 🔒 Documentation 🔒
Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Scored2026-09-03medium confidenceLatest monitoring period ends: 2022-12-31

evidence: 37/37 registry documents analyzed · 5 red flags

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
AMS-III.AO, AMS-III.D, AMS-I.C No methodology-specific rules: the general rules apply. Read the general rules
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.1 · analysed on 3 Sep 2026 · 37/37 registry documents analyzed · re-assessment under v2.2 pending

Analysis

A VCS-registered methane recovery project in the Netherlands with a confirmed barrier additionality test and an avoidance-based design that eliminates reversal risk. However, the verification report (December 2024) lists ten material findings and nineteen corrective actions, including calculation errors in thermal energy and transportation emissions, an unmeasured biogas production pathway, and an increase in manure quantities beyond the PDD baseline. The 0.5 conservativity factor partially offsets these concerns, but the project-specific modeled baseline and a 0% leakage deduction with only a 'deemed negligible' justification leave moderate over-crediting risk.

Red Flags

5 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Gates applied

The gates applied to this score are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 3 Sep 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 5 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 37 registry documents (37 analyzed).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project credit type

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 1 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-11-01

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2007
9,0059,0050
2010
31,83914,85016,989
2011
49,463049,463
2012
59,88257,2662,616
2013
56,12028,38027,740
2014
51,40750,0831,324
2015
54,52454,5240
2016
56,99456,9940
2017
28,84127,5611,280
2018
13,7986,8796,919
2019
19,5219,33410,187
2020
22,9752,50620,469
2021
26,3851,59024,795
2022
21,119021,119
Total501,873318,972182,901

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2008–2011AMS-III.D v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2010–2011AMS-III.Dversion not confirmed in the document text

    monitoring report

  3. 2012AMS-III.D v11.0since replaced by v22.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2017–2021AMS-I.C v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2017–2021AMS-III.AO v1.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2017–2021AMS-III.D v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  7. 2022AMS-I.C v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  8. 2022AMS-III.AO v1.0current version

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  9. 2022AMS-III.D v21.0since replaced by v22.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-I.C: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.AO: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on
  • AMS-III.D: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+54)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

Marketplaces

Each listing shows what the shop published on the day it was checked. The registry balance on this page is not a seller's stock, and some shops show no price.

ClimateBridge Exchange

the shop's home page — no offer page for this project

€11.95/tCO2

Vintage 2012

376 tCO2 available

checked on 31 Oct 2026

↗
+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.