UCRBrazilACM0006

132 MW Sugarcane Bagasse based co-generation Energy USINA CORURIPE

UCR-545 ↗

#147of 196 in Biomass#94of 104 in Brazil#180of 421 in Universal Carbon Registry (UCR)#30of 53 in ACM0006

3.4/ 10
Integrity
4.0
Transparency
2.0
Claim Safety
4.5
Documentation
2.5

Scored2026-08-19medium confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

The 132 MW sugarcane bagasse co-generation project at Usina Coruripe (UCR-545) uses a jurisdictional baseline and a recognised CDM methodology (ACM0006 v16), but the extracted record contains only a single PDD with no verification report, monitoring report, or VVB assessment. Critical integrity elements — additionality testing, functional newness/replacement baseline, and verified emission reductions — are absent from the available documents, making it impossible to independently confirm the 76,149 tCO₂e claim. The PDD is dated 18 June 2025, which post-dates the 2013–2024 crediting period, raising questions about document provenance.

Red Flags

  • Only a PDD is available in the extracted record; no verification report, monitoring report, or VVB assessment was found, leaving additionality, permanence, and MRV unverified.
  • The PDD is dated 18 June 2025, which is after the end of the 2013–2024 crediting period; the document's origin and purpose are unclear.
  • No verified emission-reduction figure is available to cross-check against the 76,149 tCO₂e lifetime claim.
  • Leakage is set at 0% on the basis of a 'deemed negligible' justification with no quantitative displacement or substitution analysis provided.
  • Functional newness / replacement baseline (FN/RB) method and value are not stated in any available document.

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Test type and VVB confirmation not stated in available docum

Permanence

No buffer-pool or reversal-event data found; unassessed

Leakage

0% deduction with 'deemed negligible' justification, no quan

Baseline

Jurisdictional baseline stated in PDD

Safeguards

Safeguards mentioned and benefit-sharing described, but FPIC

Double-claim

CORSIA eligibility and CCP status not stated in available do

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-19ACM0006
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →