Skip to main content
GSGeothermalTurkeyACM0002

Babadere Geothermal Power Plant (GEPP)

GS-786 ↗ · current registry ID: GS4441

#31of 770 in Renewable energy#8of 121 in Turkey#9of 426 in Gold Standard (GS)#24of 383 in ACM0002

6.7/ 10
Integrity
7.0
Transparency
6.5
Claim Safety
6.5
Documentation
6.5

Audit Analysis

The Babadere Geothermal Power Plant is a well-structured Gold Standard renewable energy project with a VVB-confirmed investment additionality test and an appropriate jurisdictional grid-emission-factor baseline. However, the project experienced significant technical disruptions (a 20-month generation outage) resulting in roughly 31% under-delivery versus the period estimate, and nine cross-document contradictions—particularly around FPIC status, baseline method, and the ex-ante versus verified ERR figures—introduce data-reliability concerns. CORSIA eligibility without a stated CCP position adds a moderate double-claiming risk.

Red Flags

  • Nine cross-document contradictions identified, including FPIC status (PDD says not conducted; 2025 validation report says conducted), baseline method (jurisdictional vs project-specific), and a 2.8× gap between the PDD ex-ante ERR (133,266 tCO2e) and the verified monitoring-period ERR (47,920 tCO2e).
  • CORSIA eligibility is confirmed while CCP status is not stated in any available document, leaving the double-claiming pathway partially unassessed.
  • The project could not generate electricity between July 2016 and March 2018 due to technical problems, and the verified ERR for the 2020–2023 monitoring period was approximately 31% below the period estimate (47,920 vs 69,456 tCO2e), indicating operational fragility.
  • One corrective action remains open: the next verification team must review meter test reports.

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed investment test, IRR 7.04% vs 15% benchmark

Permanence

Avoidance project, no reversal events reported

Leakage

0% deduction, quantified justification, appropriate for powe

Baseline

Jurisdictional grid EF appropriate, but method contradicted

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism present, but FPIC status contradicted be

Double-claim

CORSIA-eligible confirmed, CCP status not stated in any docu

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24ACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents