Skip to main content
VCSEnergy industries (renewable/non-renewable sources); Waste handling and disposalTurkey Registry: RegisteredACM0001

BERGAMA INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY AND ELECTRICITY GENERATION FACILITY

VCS-3638 ↗

#36of 202 in Industrial#52of 121 in Turkey#239of 629 in Verra (VCS)#13of 53 in ACM0001

5.6/ 10
Integrity
5.8
Transparency
5.2
Claim Safety
5.8
Documentation
5.8

Audit Analysis

The Bergama waste-to-energy project in Turkey has a VVB-confirmed combined additionality test and a measured baseline, but suffers from four inter-document contradictions, an unaddressed permanence framework, and a significant gap between the PDD's ex-ante estimate (1.38 M tCO₂e) and the verified figure (153 k tCO₂e) for the same crediting period. The project is under-delivering relative to its initial projections, which reduces over-crediting risk but raises questions about the robustness of the original design assumptions.

Red Flags

  • Four contradictions between documents, including FPIC status (true vs false across two validation reports), baseline characterisation (measured vs modeled), total ERR (1,378,074 vs 152,852), and leakage justification (quantified vs not addressed)
  • Reversal/permanence risk explicitly 'not addressed' and no buffer pool percentage stated in any available document
  • Verified ERR of 152,852 tCO₂e represents only ~11% of the PDD's ex-ante estimate of 1,378,074 tCO₂e for the same crediting period (2020-10-31 to 2023-01-31), indicating the original projections were highly optimistic
  • Installed capacity inconsistency (9.898 MWe vs 8.4 MWe) required clarification during verification, suggesting initial data quality issues

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-confirmed combined test

Permanence

Reversal risk not addressed; no buffer pool stated

Leakage

0% deduction; justification contradicted across documents

Baseline

Project-specific; measured vs modeled contradiction

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24ACM0001+ACM0022

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents