Skip to main content
ArchivedVCSavoidanceIndiaRegistry: RegisteredACM0002

Bundled Solar Power Project by D.J. Malpani and Giriraj Enterprises

Developer: D.J. Malpani and Giriraj Enterprises

VCS-1670 ↗

This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-09-01).

Assessment

Historical analysis — archived

01020304 Overall 4.0 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Archived — historical analysis · 2026-09-01

Analysis

A bundled solar power project in India with a jurisdictional baseline and VVB-verified additionality, but plagued by an extraordinary volume of material findings and corrective actions (over 40 items) spanning inconsistent dates, missing calibration certificates, absent stakeholder consultation evidence, and formatting errors. The project remains in 'Verification approval requested' status, and the low extraction confidence across 43 documents compounds concerns about data reliability. While the core design (jurisdictional baseline, avoidance credits, smart-meter monitoring) is sound, the execution and documentation quality fall well below acceptable standards.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 42 registry documents (42 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMACM0002

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-09-27

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2015
34,01233,99913
2016
93,64793,6470
2017
127,331127,3310
2018
75,01572,0153,000
2019
98,10198,03170
2020
94,92594,9250
2021
94,01878,85115,167
2022
26,05224,3981,654
Total643,101623,19719,904

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records. (+78)

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceACM0002

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →