Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory

Rated

Deactivated Projects

Standard
GS
Methodology
AMS-II.G (CDM)
Registry
GS-419 ↗ · current registry ID: GS2563 · Registered
Country
Rwanda
Credit type
Energy Efficiency - Domestic

CarbonMeld's document-based assessment gives Deactivated Projects (GS-419) 6.1 out of 10 (medium confidence) under CarbonMeld methodology v2.2, analysed on 28 Oct 2026. The analysis read 17 of the 19 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 6.1 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Methodology v2.2 · analysed on 28 Oct 2026

A fact the document-based rating needs was not collected when this page was analysed, so the page keeps its version 2.2 score. Missing: the source of the fNRB value (it was not asked when this page was analysed)

How this analysis was made

Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v2.2 · analysed on 28 Oct 2026 · 17/19 registry documents read

Analysis

Deactivated Projects (Rwanda) introduces energy-efficient cookstoves that use less non-renewable biomass (SAVE80 cookstove (Save80 B and Save80 C)) under AMS-II.G. ver. 3; registry status Registered (GS), 43,836 credits issued (vintages 2014–2018). The documents name Carbon Check (India) Private Ltd as validation / verification body. The latest verification report (2016-07-01 – 2017-06-30) verifies 14,530 tCO2e.

Red Flags

No red flags in the documents read.

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    Methodology not approved by ICVCMAMS-II.G

    The Integrity Council assessed this methodology as not meeting the Core Carbon Principles.

    Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    Not published

    This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2014
2,83502,835
2015
9,31109,311
2016
12,854012,854
2017
13,068013,068
2018
5,76805,768
Total43,836043,836

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2013–2014AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2014–2015AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2016–2017AMS-II.G v3.0since replaced by v14.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-II.G: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

Profile & governance

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: the reasons behind the score, the red flags and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Deactivated Projects (GS-419): CarbonMeld analysis, methodology v2.2, analysed on 28 Oct 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/deactivated-projects-gs-419/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and date; the score itself is on this page.

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, score factors, detailed analysis, and 19 registry documents (17 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.