⚠
This rating is archived — the project is no longer listed or its registry
data has changed. This is the last published analysis (2026-08-10).
4.3/ 10
Integrity
6.5
Transparency
2.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
2.8
Score Breakdown
integrity
transparency
claim_safety
documentation
Source: CarbonMeld — independent carbon credit market intelligence. Quality scores and document-based audits for 15,000+ projects: carbonmeld.com
Detailed Analysis
▼
Integrity
Transparency
Claim Safety
Documentation
Overall
Audit Analysis
The project demonstrates solid upfront additionality verification but suffers from severe documentation gaps and missing monitoring data for its full crediting period. Without verified emission reduction figures or clear eligibility statuses, claim safety and transparency remain weak, limiting overall confidence in credit quality.
Project Description
Red Flags
⚠No monitoring reports or verified emission reduction figures available for the full crediting period
⚠Leakage was quantified but the exact deduction percentage is missing from the records
⚠CORSIA and CCP eligibility status are unknown, leaving double-counting risks unaddressed
⚠Low extraction confidence indicates poor readability or incompleteness of key source documents
Credit Vintages
No issuances recorded on the registry.
What would improve this score
Questi suggerimenti indicano quali prove pubbliche aggiuntive potrebbero migliorare il livello di confidenza di questa valutazione. Non garantiscono un punteggio futuro più alto.