ISOCarbon RemovalGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Project Nandani

ISO-1JWX91R5E1S0 ↗

#45of 52 in ISO

2.7/ 10
Integrity
3.5
Transparency
1.0
Claim Safety
3.5
Documentation
2.5

Scored2026-09-02high confidence

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

Audit Analysis

Project Nandani is a carbon removal project under the Isometric Standard with a 200-year permanence claim, but the available documentation is extremely limited (only a PDD and stakeholder consultation record). Critical verification data—including VVB confirmation of additionality, ERR figures, monitoring results, and buffer pool arrangements—are entirely absent, making it impossible to independently assess the project's integrity or claim safety.

Red Flags

  • No VVB verification of additionality found in any available document; the combined test is described but unconfirmed by an independent body
  • Zero percent leakage deduction justified only as 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis, which is a significant gap for a carbon removal project
  • No buffer pool percentage stated despite a 200-year permanence claim; reversal risk is addressed only through SOPs and monitoring language without quantified safeguards
  • No ERR figures (ex-ante, claimed, or verified) are available in any document, preventing any assessment of over- or under-crediting
  • Only two documents (PDD and stakeholder consultation) are available; no verification report, monitoring report, or third-party audit is present

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test described but no VVB verification found

Permanence

200-year claim, no buffer pool, reversal prevention via SOPs only

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' with no quantified analysis

Baseline

Project-specific, no reassessment date, no measured-vs-modeled info

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not confirmed

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1
Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents →