No public grade applies yet

Up Energy Improved Cookstoves Programme, Uganda – CPA No 022

Standard: GS
Methodology: GS-TPDDTEC (GS)
Registry: GS-2909 ↗ · current registry ID: GS10920 · Registered
Country: Uganda
Credit type: Energy Efficiency - Domestic
Developer: UpEnergy Group

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives Up Energy Improved Cookstoves Programme, Uganda – CPA No 022 (GS-2909) no number (No public grade applies yet): CarbonMeld read its documents, but its type of project does not yet have a public grade that applies to it on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Assessment

Document-based rating

No public grade applies yet

No public source has yet given this type of project grades on both additionality and quantification that apply here. CarbonMeld read this project's documents. The analysis is below. The page can receive a number once a public grade of its type of project applies on both additionality and quantification. The absence of a number says nothing about the project's quality.

Negative facts

The fNRB value used (76.0%) is more than 30% above the official value.

Evidence coverage: high

Methodology v3 · documents read on 7 Nov 2026

Starting point

Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project
Quantification: no public grade of this type of project applies
Claim safety: no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that raise a dimension: 1

Rules that lower a dimension or the rating as a whole: 1

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Not counted by the method

Quantification: no public grade of this type of project applies
Quantification: CCQI grades version 3.1 of this methodology, and an ICVCM decision's version range separates this project's version from it
The ICVCM's decision: the ICVCM approved this methodology under conditions, and the documents read do not show them met
The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · About the System

How this analysis was made

Standard: Gold Standard (GS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology: TPDDTEC v.4 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method: CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 7 Nov 2026

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

Airlines (CORSIA)
No CORSIA label on the registry
Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.
Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026
Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry
Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)
Methodology approved by ICVCMGS TPDDTEC
The methodology meets the Core Carbon Principles; this project's credits do not carry the CCP label yet.
Source: ICVCM assessment · ICVCM table read on 4 Nov 2026
Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits
Removal or reduction
Emission reduction or avoidance
Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.
Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026
Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits
Paris Agreement (Article 6)
Not published
This registry does not publish Article 6 authorizations.

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

	Issued	Retired	Available
2020	12,808	6,404	6,404
2021	15,270	6,815	8,455
2022	15,306	15,001	305
2023	14,897	11,771	3,126
2024	13,293	1,600	11,693
Total	71,574	41,591	29,983

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

2020AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2020–2021AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2021AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2021AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2022AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2022AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2023AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2023AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report + verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
2024AMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
verification report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026
Period not statedAMS-II.G v5.0since replaced by v14.0
monitoring report
official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026

AMS-II.G: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on 1 Oct 2026

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Eni Plenitude spa Società Benefit7,240 t

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Report an error on this page

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Report an error on this page

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Report an error on this page →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). Up Energy Improved Cookstoves Programme, Uganda – CPA No 022 (GS-2909): CarbonMeld document-based analysis, methodology v3, documents read on 7 Nov 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/up-energy-improved-cookstoves-programme-uganda-cpa-no-022/.

The citation names the analysis by its methodology version and the day the documents were read; the page gives no number.

Unlock the full analysis

Every rule that applies to the project, each with its fact, its quote, its source and, where it has them, its points; the detail and quotes of the negative facts; and 50 registry documents (50 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Email — optional for card, required for crypto

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.