CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Workbench ProjectsDevelopersComparePortfolioCCP trackerA–Z index

Re-assessment pending

AVOIDING PLANNED DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION IN THE VALDIVIAN COASTAL RESERVE, CHILE

Standard
VCS
Methodology
VM0007 (VCS)
Registry
VCS-1175 ↗ · Registered
Country
Chile
Credit type
Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use
Developer
The Nature Conservancy
Worked comparison example (English)

CarbonMeld's document-based rating gives AVOIDING PLANNED DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION IN THE VALDIVIAN COASTAL RESERVE, CHILE (VCS-1175) 2.3 out of 10 (Very low rating) under CarbonMeld methodology v3, documents read on 3 Nov 2026; a re-assessment is pending. The analysis read 41 of the 49 registry documents. It is CarbonMeld's own assessment, not a rating given by the registry or the standard.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based rating

01020304 Document-based rating 2.3 / 10
Additionality 🔒 Quantification 🔒 Permanence 🔒 Claim safety 🔒
The dimension values are in Premium — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero values.

Document-based rating

2.3/10

Very low rating (under 3.5)

Evidence coverage: high

How solid the credit is, as far as the registry's public documents show. Additionality and quantification start from a public grade; permanence starts at 5.0, the neutral point, where none applies, and claim safety always does.

This rating is provisional. A new analysis of the project is pending.

Methodology v3 · documents read on 3 Nov 2026

Starting point

  • Additionality: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme)
  • Quantification: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI does not list this methodology under this programme: the grade CCQI gives this type of project under the programme)
  • Permanence: CCQI's score for this type of project (CCQI grades permanence by programme: this is its grade of the project's programme)
  • Claim safety: neutral (5.0) — no public grade of this type of project applies

Rules that raised the number: 1

Rules that lowered the number: 2

Each rule, with the fact and the source it rests on, is in the Premium analysis.

Negative facts

  • The registry's record shows: credits replaced

Credits issued under this methodology cannot receive the CCP label (ICVCM, 15 Nov 2024).

Not counted in the number

  • The baseline type: not among the facts read
  • The oldest vintage still on sale, the content of the safeguards and the verifier's quality: not among the facts read

Analysed on 3 Nov 2026Latest verified period ends:

evidence: 41/49 registry documents read

Generated by CarbonMeld Analysis Pipeline · Methodology · Editorial Policy · About the System
Download Report (PDF)

How this analysis was made

Standard
Verra (VCS) How our current method reads projects of this standard
Methodology
VM0007 Version 1.2 How our current method reads projects of this type
Our method
CarbonMeld methodology v3 · documents read on 3 Nov 2026 · 41/49 registry documents read

Analysis

AVOIDING PLANNED DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION IN THE VALDIVIAN COASTAL RESERVE, CHILE (Chile) avoids deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) (avoided deforestation (protection of Coastal Olivillo and Coastal evergreen forests)) under VM0007 Version 1.2; registry status Registered (VCS), 516,584 credits issued (vintages 2003–2013). The documents name Environmental Services, Inc as validation body and Environmental Services, Inc (2003-11-04 – 2011-11-03), Rainforest Alliance (2011-11-04 – 2014-11-03) as verification bodies. The latest monitoring report (2014-11-04 – 2023-11-03) reports 18,962 tCO2e achieved. The verification report of 2025-09-26 states a negative quantity for 2014-11-04 – 2023-11-03: -18,962 tCO2e, net emissions for that period — no credits for it. The registry required a reversal to be remedied (its credit replacement statement of 2026-08-24).

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No CCP label under this methodology

    Credits issued under this methodology cannot receive the CCP label (ICVCM, 15 Nov 2024).

    Source: ICVCM assessment · read date not recorded

    Covers: the methodology (every project using it), not this project's credits

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: methodology

    Covers: the project type, not a label on individual credits

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label · read on 12 Nov 2026

    Covers: this project's credit records as read on the registry

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2003
91,32072,3580
2004
121,301103,80117,500
2005
48,31347,346967
2006
45,85242,3763,476
2007
38,21438,2131
2008
27,29227,2920
2009
35,06135,0610
2010
36,97936,9790
2011
27,21127,2110
2012
28,31728,3161
2013
16,72416,166558
Total516,584475,11922,503

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2003–2011VM0007 v1.3since replaced by v1.8

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2003–2023VM0007 v1.5since replaced by v1.8

    issuance document

    official page · verified on

  3. 2011–2014VM0007 v1.4since replaced by v1.8

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2014–2023VM0007 v1.5since replaced by v1.8

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  • VM0007: Active (Verra / Verified Carbon Standard) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at listings@carbonmeld.com.

⚑ Contest this rating

Profile & governance

Methodology·Editorial Policy·About the System·Carbon credit ratings explained·Carbon credit due diligence checklist

Are you the project owner?

Full analysis (free for owners)

Owners get free access to the full analysis of their own project: every rule that raised or lowered the number, with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and the documents read. Write to us from your organisation's email address.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the rating.

hello@carbonmeld.com →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →

Cite this page

CarbonMeld (2026). AVOIDING PLANNED DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION IN THE VALDIVIAN COASTAL RESERVE, CHILE (VCS-1175): CarbonMeld document-based rating, methodology v3, documents read on 3 Nov 2026. https://carbonmeld.com/projects/avoiding-planned-deforestation-and-degradation-in-the-valdivian-coastal-reserve-/.

The citation names the rating by its methodology version and the day the documents were read.

Unlock the full analysis

On this page: the analysis of 3 Nov 2026, marked “Re-assessment pending”. The dimension values of the rating, every rule that raised or lowered the number with the fact and the source it rests on, the negative facts' detail and quotes, and 49 registry documents (41 read).

€9+ VAT per month · card subscription, renews automatically until you cancel

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and the dimension values in side-by-side comparisons, when every rated project is on the same version of our methodology (public-data comparison, the negative facts included, is free; fair use: 30 projects per day, or 300 with Pro at €49 + VAT per month). Cancel any time from your account page. Crypto: $9 for one month, no automatic renewal.

Enter your email to pay with crypto

Price + VAT · By subscribing or paying you accept the Terms of Use — the card subscription renews every month until you cancel; digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Similar projects

Same methodology or sector, the same registry first.