Skip to main content
CarbonMeld CarbonMeld Carbon Observatory
Tools
EN
Re-assessment pendingVCSWaste handling and disposalThailandRegistry: RegisteredAMS-III.H

Banpong Tapioca Flour Industrial Wastewater Treatment and Biogas Utilisation Project

Developer: Banpong Tapioca Flour Industrial Co., Ltd

VCS-405 ↗

#239of 523 in Biogas#82of 138 in Thailand#1068of 1609 in Verra (VCS)#73of 142 in AMS-III.H

Score from methodology v2.1 (analysis of 1 Sep 2026). Re-assessment under v2.2 pending.

Assessment

CarbonMeld document-based assessment

01020304 Overall 4.8 / 10 Dimension scores are locked — the faint arcs are empty tracks, not zero scores.

Scale 0–10 · method weights: integrity 35% · transparency 25% · claim safety 25% · documentation 15%.

Re-assessment pending · v2.1

Analysis

A long-running Thai biogas project with confirmed additionality and no reversal events, but plagued by significant monitoring data gaps (missing biogas records, broken meters, absent temperature logs) that led the VVB to verify only 53% of the amount claimed in the monitoring report. The project-specific baseline, absence of a stated buffer pool, and 25+ corrective action requests across verification cycles indicate moderate structural weaknesses in the credit's integrity and reliability.

Red Flags

4 red flags detected — Unlock with Premium

Findings

Risk Indicators

Additionality

🔒

Permanence

🔒

Leakage

🔒

Baseline

🔒

Safeguards

🔒

Double-claim

🔒

Risk indicator details are a Premium feature

Score Breakdown

Score factors per dimension are a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Detailed Analysis

The detailed per-dimension analysis is a Premium feature — Unlock with Premium

Evidence

Unlock the full analysis

Per-dimension scores, risk indicators, 4 red flags, score factors, detailed analysis, and 42 registry documents (40 analyzed).

€9+ VAT · 30-day pass · one-time, no auto-renewal

Every rated project, PDF reports, API access, portfolio alerts and per-dimension scores with red-flag details in side-by-side comparisons for 30 days (public-data comparison is free; fair use: 30 projects per day).

Price + VAT · By paying you accept the Terms of Use — digital content, no refunds. How Premium works

Eligibility & market

What can you claim with this credit?

Four checks buyers ask about, from the registry and the Integrity Council (ICVCM).

  • Airlines (CORSIA)

    No CORSIA label on the registry

    Not usable for airlines' CORSIA obligations.

    Source: registry label

  • Integrity label (ICVCM CCP)

    No ICVCM information

    No CCP label and no ICVCM decision found for this project's methodology.

  • Removal or reduction

    Emission reduction or avoidance

    Prevents or reduces emissions — fits contribution claims, not SBTi neutralisation.

    Source: project sector

  • Paris Agreement (Article 6)

    No Article 6 authorization

    No corresponding adjustment: the host country can also count this reduction towards its own target.

    Source: registry label

Information only, from public sources. Claim rules (CORSIA, SBTi, EU rules on green claims) change: check them before making a public claim. Since 27 September 2026, EU consumer rules do not allow “climate neutral” product claims based on offsets.

Registry labels last checked:2026-10-04

Credit Vintages

IssuedRetiredAvailable
2006
11,13811,1380
2007
14,02314,0230
2008
11,61611,6160
2009
7,8137,8130
2010
13,00013,0000
2011
10,7647,0763,688
2012
5,9855,735250
2013
8,1627,1621,000
2014
7,6727,6720
2015
2,6962,6960
2016
29,44427,7611,683
2017
42,94042,9400
2018
30,67430,62747
2019
32,77732,76116
2020
19,25219,2520
2021
10,25610,2560
2023
5505500
Total258,762252,0786,684

Methodology versions used

The methodology version stated in each monitoring, verification and issuance document, by period, compared with the official methodology pages.

  1. 2006–2008AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  2. 2009–2013AMS-III.H v13.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  3. 2013–2016AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  4. 2016–2017AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  5. 2017–2018AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report

    official page · verified on

  6. 2019AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  7. 2020AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  8. 2020–2021AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report

    official page · verified on

  9. 2021–2023AMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    monitoring report + verification report + issuance document

    official page · verified on

  10. Period not statedAMS-III.H v18.0since replaced by v19.0

    verification report

    official page · verified on

  • AMS-III.H: Active (CDM / UNFCCC) · official page · verified on

A version is shown only when the document's own text writes it next to the methodology code. Current versions, status and CCP ranges come from the official pages linked, checked on the date shown.

Documents on the registry

Retired by

Organisations named as beneficiaries in the registry's public retirement records.

Where to buy

Got an offer for these credits? Check it against the registry →

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

Profile & governance

Analysis ProvenanceAMS-III.H

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected] →

Contest this rating

Something wrong in the analysis, or a registry document we have not used? Send us the link to the public source: you get a reference and an answer within 30 days.

Contest this rating →