Skip to main content
ISOCarbon RemovalGeneral Methodologyv2.1

Capital Link's Berthoud Facility

ISO-1JYENJXB71S0 ↗

#37of 52 in ISO

3.6/ 10
Integrity
4.5
Transparency
2.5
Claim Safety
4.0
Documentation
3.0

Audit Analysis

The Berthoud Biochar Facility is a carbon-removal project under the Isometric standard with a 200-year permanence claim and 148,500 tonnes of claimed removals, but the available documentation is limited to a PDD and a stakeholder consultation record. No independent verification body is named, no monitoring or verification report is present, and several key MRV parameters (fnrb method, usage monitoring, grid emission factor) are not stated. The project shows no material findings or reversal events, but the absence of a buffer pool, a project-specific baseline, and a thin leakage justification leave meaningful gaps in the integrity and claim-safety picture.

Red Flags

  • No independent verification body (VVB) is named in the available documents, and additionality verification status is unconfirmed
  • 200-year permanence claim with no buffer pool percentage stated, leaving no quantified safety margin against reversal
  • No monitoring report or verified ERR figure is available; the 148,500 tCO₂e claim rests solely on the PDD
  • Leakage deduction of 0% is justified only as 'deemed negligible' without a quantified assessment
  • Only two documents (PDD and stakeholder consultation) are in the evidence set; no verification or monitoring report is present

Credit Vintages

Issuance data not yet available — check back soon.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

Combined test present but VVB verification unconfirmed

Permanence

200-yr claim, low risk score, no buffer pool stated

Leakage

0% deduction, 'deemed negligible' without quantified assessment

Baseline

Project-specific baseline, no reassessment date stated

Safeguards

Grievance mechanism and benefit sharing present; FPIC not conducted

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status both not stated

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-09-02General Methodology v2.1

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents