Skip to main content
VCSAgriculture Forestry and Other Land UseIndia Registry: RegisteredAR-ACM0003

CORE CARBON VANAM IN TELANGANA STATE

VCS-3478 ↗

#38of 66 in Soil carbon#308of 387 in India#490of 629 in Verra (VCS)#15of 26 in AR-ACM0003

4.6/ 10
Integrity
5.2
Transparency
4.2
Claim Safety
4.3
Documentation
4.2

Audit Analysis

The Core Carbon Vanam project in Telangana is a VCS-registered fruit-tree management project (mango and sweet orange, 8,360 trees across 18.6 ha) with a VVB-verified combined additionality test and a 20% buffer pool. However, a striking eight-fold discrepancy between the PDD's claimed ERR (8,390,382) and the validation report's figure (1,054,170), combined with 15 material findings at validation and a low extraction confidence rating, raise significant concerns about data reliability and over-crediting risk. No verified ERR figure was found in the available documents.

Red Flags

  • Eight-fold discrepancy in total ERR between the PDD (8,390,382, July 2022) and the validation report (1,054,170, June 2025) — the PDD figure is roughly 8× the validated figure, creating serious over-crediting risk if the PDD value was used for any early issuance
  • 15 material findings in the validation report spanning additionality evidence, leakage methodology, GIS/plot-area inconsistencies, non-permanence risk scoring, safeguards, benefit sharing, and monitoring plan deficiencies
  • No verified ERR figure found in any available document — the project's actual carbon delivery cannot be independently confirmed
  • Low extraction confidence across the document set, indicating at least one key document was poorly readable or incomplete
  • Leakage justification contradicts between documents: the PDD (2022) states 'deemed negligible' while the validation report (2025) states 'quantified', yet the deduction is 0% in both cases

Credit Vintages

No issuances recorded on the registry.

Risk Indicators

Additionality

VVB-verified combined test

Permanence

20% buffer pool; risk analysis done but field marked not add

Leakage

0% deduction; justification inconsistent across documents

Baseline

Project-specific; reassessment not yet due under 10-year rul

Safeguards

FPIC, grievance mechanism, benefit sharing all documented

Double-claim

CORSIA and CCP status not stated in available documents

Where to buy

+ Know where to buy this?

Listing multiple projects? Send us a CSV at [email protected].

⚑ Dispute this rating
Analysis ProvenanceScored2026-08-24AR-ACM0003

Are you the project owner?

Metadata correction (free)

Name, country, marketplace or links incorrect? Let us know.

Does not modify the score.

[email protected]

Pipeline re-run with new documents

Have updated documentation not yet included? You can request a new run of the pipeline with the new inputs.

Submit Documents